Showing posts with label uranium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label uranium. Show all posts

Friday, September 4, 2009

Trucks Carrying Nuclear Weapons Around The Country Revealed

Comment: Scary, it would be safer to use a milk truck, better made than this truck

Posted: 09- 3-09 04:45 PM

The idea of nuclear weapons being carted around in our highways, cities and neighborhoods doesn't really put one's mind at ease. However, the government has been transporting seriously dangerous stuff like enriched uranium and plutonium secretly without public warning.

Friends of the Earth through the Freedom of Information Act has forced the Department Of Energy to release color photos of the trucks used to transport weapons. According to FOE, these are the first of such pictures that have been released in many years.

Tom Clements, Southeastern Nuclear Campaign Coordinator with Friends of the Earth in Columbia, South Carolina made the following statement about the importance of the release of the photos.

"The trucks carrying nuclear weapons and dangerous materials such as plutonium pass through cities and neighborhoods all the time and the public should be aware of what they look like.


Release of these photos will help inform the public about secretive shipments of dangerous nuclear material that are taking place in plain view."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/03/trucks-carrying-nuclear-w_n_276765.html

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Helen Caldicott, MD

Cow in Iraq


Born in Melbourne, Australia in 1938, Dr Caldicott received her medical degree from the University of Adelaide Medical School in 1961. She founded the Cystic Fibrosis Clinic at the Adelaide Children's Hospital in 1975 and subsequently was an instructor in pediatrics at Harvard Medical School and on the staff of the Children's Hospital Medical Center, Boston, Mass., until 1980 when she resigned to work full time on the prevention of nuclear war.


John LeKay: Many Native Americans in the US who have mined the uranium or live near the abandoned mines, have experienced some unusual symptoms; particularly with the Lakota people in the South Dakota reservations: Standing Rock, Rock Creek, Harding County and Pine Ridge and the Navaho Natives in some parts of Nevada and New Mexico.

Helen Caldicott: Yes.
John LeKay: Brain and kidney cancer seem to be escalating. There is also an unusually high rate of birth abnormalities and an increase in women having miscarriages. What does this indicate to you and what do you think these Native Americans should be doing about this situation?

Helen Caldicott: Well, they live near uranium tailings and uranium mines, and they are exposed to radiation continuously. Either from the radon gas which is continually excreted from the uranium tailings. Radon gas is an alpha emitter, a very potent carcinogen. It causes lung cancers and various other cancers. The other material that they are exposed to continuously is radium; which is the daughter of uranium; which is very soluble and which LEACHES from the uranium tailings into their water supply and re-concentrates back into their food. So they are eating radioactive food. Radium itself causes bone cancer or leukemia but can cause other nasty side effects such as congenital anomalies and the like. So these people are living in a consistent field of radioactive materials. That's why their incidences of cancer and congenital defects are high.

John LeKay: Have you ever treated anyone with uranium sickness?

Helen Caldicott: No, I haven't. I haven't worked in hospitals close to uranium mines, but in the past, one-third of the men who have mined uranium have developed or died of lung cancer. Mining uranium is a very dangerous occupation and so is living near these tailings. The tailings themselves, the waste products FROM uranium mining, are very radioactive and should be re-buried back into the soil and they never are.

John LeKay: What about the uranium dust that is picked up by the wind?

Helen Caldicott: The dust is very radioactive and it carries with it radon gas; and uranium dust itself is a very potent carcinogen that causes bone cancer; it causes lung cancer; it causes leukemia; it causes kidney cancer and it can cause congenital malformations. So the dust is very very dangerous.

John LeKay: There is a lot of wild life around the area where all these mines are. What about the cattle that are grazing on the grass and drinking the water. Could radium be passed through to the human population this way?

Helen Caldicott: Yes, radium, which is the daughter of uranium and uranium itself both concentrate in the cattle, in the food, and in the muscle; and therefore people will almost certainly be eating radioactive meat from cattle that are grazing nearby.


Cancerous lung caused by uranium dust

John LeKay: I believe that the cattle meat in South Dakota is sold to every single state in the US.
Helen Caldicott: Well, it depends on how close the cattle are to the uranium tailings. How close are they? Are they where they graze?

John LeKay: There are 89 abandoned mines located in the Black Hills. I have been told some of the cattle ranches border the reservations. Apparently rainwater is constantly running off the Riley Pass uranium mine and into the Grand River and the grasslands water. I read that many of the cattle that drink this water have hair that is turning white. Environmentalist, Harold One Father and Charmaine Whiteface, who is also a biologist and member of the Defenders of the Black Hills, articulate this problem on the following NPR radio link:
www.sdpb.org/Archives/ProgramDetail.asp?ProgID=3811

Cow in Iraq

Helen Caldicott: If they are grazing near the uranium tailings, that's a very dangerous thing to do.

John LeKay: How does uranium affect the DNA?

Helen Caldicott: Uranium actually clings to the DNA; chemically combines with DNA so much so that in medicine, in histology, in pathology, we use uranYl ions (which are uranium ions) to increase the stainings in our preparations BECAUSE URANIUM chemically combines with DNA. Obviously because of this mechanism, uranium damages DNA. URANIUM IS ALSO a heavy metal AND like all heavy metals it IS EXCRETED THROUGH THE KIDNEY WHERE IT CAN CAUSE ACUTE NEPHRITIS AND ALSO KIDNEY CANCER YEARS LATER BECAUSE IT IS radioactive. So, from three perspectives - it can damage DNA, causing mutations and cancer, IT CAN DAMAGE KIDNEY FUNCTION and IT CAN CAUSE congenital anomalies BECAUSE IT IS EXCRETED IN THE SEMEN AS WELL AS IN THE URINE.


Nuclear Madness: What You Can Do
by Helen Caldicott

John LeKay: So, that would be passed on to generations of people?

Helen Caldicott: If the DNA is damaged in the eggs or the sperm - those congenital or genetic abnormalities could or would be passed on to future generations.

John LeKay: So what it's really doing is DAMAGING the gene pool of these people?

Helen Caldicott: Exactly. If you want to read more about this - read my book "Nuclear Madness, What You Can Do" (you can get it from Amazon) and then you will understand lay terminology and how these things can damage the DNA; how they ca n cause cancer and the like.
John LeKay: Is there a difference between depleted uranium and NATURAL uranium in terms of it's toxicity?

Helen Caldicott: Depleted is uranium. Depleted uranium IS just named depleted because when you dig uranium up from the ground there are basically two isotopes. They are both radioactive; one is uranium 235, which is used to power nuclear power plants and to make nuclear bombs, and the stuff that is left after you remove the uranium 235 is uranium 238 and it's called depleted only because it's depleted of uranium 235.

Uranium 235

John LeKay:. In terms of the health hazards ; it's really basically the same thing. It doesn't make a difference if it's depleted or not?

Helen Caldicott: Correct. In medical terms - no difference.

John LeKay: Do you think the Gulf War Syndrome could be a depleted uranium sickness?

Helen Caldicott: Yes, absolutely. A large NUMBER of the Gulf War Syndrome SYMPTOMS ARE RELATED TO the URANIUM TOXICITY, caused by depleted uranium, OR uranium 238 AS I prefer to call it. If you want to read about that, one of my latest books is called :

"The New Nuclear Danger
George W. Bush's Military Industrial Complex"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1565847407?v=glance
There's a whole chapter on depleted uranium and what they are doing in Iraq.

Depleted Uranium's effects on children in Iraq

John LeKay: Why do you think depleted uranium weapons have not been banned?

Helen Caldicott: Because the Pentagon likes them.

John LeKay: Why do you think that is?

Helen Caldicott: Well, because they are very effective weapons. The shells are made of ten POUNDS of solid uranium 238 which is 1.7 times more dense than lead. So when it's shot out FROM A GUN at fast velocity, it reaches great momentum and it slices through the steel of the other person's tank like a hot knife through butter and it's also pyrophoric;so when it hits the tank - it burns at very very high temperature and about 80 percent of it dissIPATES into dust that can be inhaled by the children and by the people. And it is also ENTERING the food chain THROUGH CONTAMINATED water and THROUGH the milk AS WELL AS OTHER FOODSTUFFS - contaminating them for the rest of time BECAUSE the half life of uranium 238 is 4.5 billion years.

John LeKay: So in looking at the life and death cycle of uranium from mining it to putting it into weapons; it's having devastating effects on the Lakota and Navaho Natives on this side of the planet. Then in terms of where these weapons are going to land, in Iraq or elsewhere; it's going to have the same outcome on them and our young soldiers who are also exposed to it.

Helen Caldicott: Correct. You are absolutely right, but the problem you haven't mentioned - the main part of the uranium fuel cycle, which is to enrich the uranium which is mined and to put it into nuclear power plants. And uranium that is put into a nuclear power plant becomes one billion times more radioactive than the original uranium before it was put into the power plants.

John LeKay: Can you repeat that?

Helen Caldicott: A billion times more radioactive.

John LeKay: And these power plants are potentially like Chernobyl.

Helen Caldicott: Yes, and I've just written a new book called Nuclear
Power Is Not the Answer.
http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/books/1595580670/reviews
which is coming out in August and you can read all about that.

John LeKay: Have you heard anything about the white phosphorous that was used in November 2004, in the offensive incendiary "shake and bake" strike against the city of Fallujah?

Helen Caldicott: I do know that they have been using white phosphorous and napalm in Iraq. Yes, they are using white phosphorous and they are using napalm which are international war crimes.

John LeKay: Why do you believe the Geneva Chemical Weapons Conventions are not working and the International Court is not intervening at this point and just allowing this to go on?

Helen Caldicott: Well, I don't think America takes any notice of the International Court or the Geneva Conventions. It just doesn't care. It does what it just wants to do.

John LeKay: Why do you think the mainstream media is not telling us what is going on with the use of depleted uranium and the white phosphorous, napalm ?

Helen Caldicott: I think partly it's because it is a very complex medical and biological problem; and because the Pentagon is lying and saying that it's all safe and the media have a short attention span and many of the journalists don't spend enough time to investigate it. So they get confused and so they don't deal with it. Also, I think because there's a huge black ban from anyone reporting on it and it comes from the Pentagon.

John LeKay: You're saying there's a ban?

Helen Caldicott: There's a black ban; the Pentagon doesn't produce any documentation of what it's doing and the media are intimidated.

John LeKay: What do you think of the grass roots organizations, blogs and websites that are trying to get this truth out there?

Helen Caldicott: Well they are doing the best they can, but as you see, there hasn't been one major article about the medical effects of uranium or depleted uranium in the New York Times or the Washington Post. Or in any of the major newspapers, FOX and CBS and all the rest are not covering it and without the media covering the medical effects of these issues, they are not going to be covered. Serious, very serious.

John LeKay: How about where you are in Australia?

Helen Caldicott: It's not being covered in Australia either.

John LeKay. It's not?

Helen Caldicott: No.

John LeKay. Do you know if any other parts of the world have covered it, like in England or Europe?

Helen Caldicott: There have been some articles in the European press; particularly because SOME Italian soldiers are returning from Iraq and developing cancers. So there's been a big outcry and an outcry in the European Parliament as well.

John LeKay: Have you seen the Italian RAI TV documentary of the use of white phosphorous in Fallujah?

Helen Caldicott: No, I haven't.

John LeKay: It's disturbing.

Helen Calidcott: I could imagine.

John LeKay: . What would the ramifications be, if the US were to use a missile on Iraq, Iran, North Korea?

Helen Caldicott: You mean a nuclear weapon?

John LeKay: Yes.

Helen Caldicott: Well it Could trigger a nuclear war between Russia and America and destroy most life on the planet. That's what it would do. Russia PRESENTLY targets America with two and a half thousand H bombs and America targets Russia with OVER FIVE THOUSAND H bombs, on hair trigger alert, AND there's a three minute decision time for either Putin or Bush to decide whether to destroy all life on earth. So, any nuclear weapon used anywhere in the world would produce such anxiety and destabilization and paranoia that the buttons could be pressed accidentALLY or BECAUSE of a state of anxiety. So things are very very tenuous at the moment on the planet

John LeKay: You mean with what's going on in the Middle East?

Helen Caldicott: It's nothing ABOUT what's going on with Iraq or Iran. It's about American policy. Iraq has no nuclear weapons, never did, and Iran has none and ACCORDING TO THE International Atomic Energy Agency it is 5 to 10 years away from making them. So all America wants to do is go in and bomb IraN - to get it's oil.

John LeKay : It's all about the oil?

Helen Caldicott: Yes, and if you go to a website called "Project for a New American Century". It's called Project for the New American Century and download it. This project was written by Wolfowitz and Cheney and Rumsfeld and Libby and the likes.

Five years ago, six years ago and the plans to go in and bomb Iran and Iraq are all there and Syria. So they have been planning to do this for about six years.

John LeKay: Have you been more able to speak out about these issues In Australia?

Helen Caldicott: Well, I've just had a major article printed in the Melbourne Age about nuclear power, so that was good and when my book comes out in July - I'm hoping to get a lot of publicity for it so I'll be able to talk about the RENEWED US PUSH FOR nuclear power and the uranium mining in Australia. I think the book will be a great help.

For more info please visit

www.helencaldicott.com

http://www.heyokamagazine.com/HEYOKA.4.ENVIRO.HelenCaldicott.htm

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Caswell Co. Residents 'Shocked' to Learn of Terrorist Training



Comment: Scary, our NC neighbor, just down the road from Pittsylvania County! To think that an uranium mining and milling could be so close to a terrorist activities, which is not the first time NC had trouble with terrorist groups, happen back in 2001 in Wake County! Please read both articles listed below!

By Roxanna Haynes FOX8 News
July 28, 2009

CASWELL COUNTY, N.C. - Residents were shocked Monday when they learned that a group of North Carolina men charged with terrorism conspiracy had allegedly trained on property nearby.

Caswell County, a rural area of about 20,000 residents in the eastern Piedmont, is popular among hunters because of its remote areas and wide-open spaces. Residents like it for its relaxed, country-living atmosphere.

"It makes me feel a little scared," said resident Deanna Ballard after federal authorities announced that seven men had been charged with plotting "violent jihad." On Tuesday, authorities said they believe an eighth suspect is in Pakistan.

Investigators believe the men had used private property in Caswell County to train for their terrorist missions.

"For such a small town, it's very, sort of, unexpected," said Carolyn Poteat.

"I was shocked," said another resident, Thomas Lee. "Mostly everybody around here knows everybody and, see, that's the thing that got me. I don't know how they got in here without anyone ever suspecting."

Investigators won't say exactly where, but they do say Daniel Boyd -- the alleged ringleader -- stockpiled military-style weapons and trained at a rural site.

"People aren't aware. You should have though since 9/11, people would be more aware of this kind of thing," said Ballard.

http://www.myfox8.com/wghp-caswell-terrorist-reax-090728,0,3874650.story

Feds search for 8th suspect

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1624612.html

Sarah Ovaska, Staff Writer

An unnamed eighth member of a suspected North Carolina-based terrorism group is at large and wanted by federal authorities, U.S. Attorney George Holding said early this afternoon.
The individual, whose name was redacted from an indictment made public yesterday, doesn't appear to pose a danger to the larger public, said Holding, the head of the Raleigh-based federal prosecutor's office for the Eastern District of North Carolina.

"We do not believe that this defendant poses a threat to anyone in the area," Holding said.

FBI agents are actively looking to take the person into custody. Holding would not name the person, nor describe his or her involvement beyond the indictment. That individual is described as a U.S. citizen and North Carolina resident who traveled to Pakistan in October 2008 to participate in violent jihad.

Seven other men were arrested and charged yesterday with plotting to kill themselves and others in the name of Islam as part of a three-year investigation by the FBI.

Those arrested Monday include Daniel Patrick Boyd, 39, who was considered the ringleader of the group, and who fought with Afghan Muslims against the Soviets; Hysen Sherifi, 24; Anes Subasic, 33; Zakariya Boyd, 20, and Dylan Boyd, 22; Mohammad Omar Aly Hassan, 22; and Ziyad Yaghi, a 21-year-old Cary High School graduate.

Holding added that this week's indictments and charges have no bearing on the larger Muslim community in the Triangle.

"No one should take this as an indictment of the Muslim community," Holding said.

The named suspects are expected to be in court later this week for detention hearings.

Friday, July 24, 2009

Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining Stream Damage Could Take 1,000 Years to Fix


Comment: Mt. Top Removal is horrible and unethical! Open Pit Uranium mining, it is horrible. A Canadian uranium company will blow around 100-200 acres with two huge pits. This will ruin miles and miles around the areas closest to the mines. People have lived on a lot of this land for 5-7 generations and it will be ruin with dust, wells will have higher concentration of lead, cows will be poison, vegetation will be cover with uranium dust! Gretna and parts of Chatham will be no more. The Bannister will be running with water with higher concentration of lead, arsenic, and uranium with fish kills, bird kills, deer kills, or any animal that drinks the water. The water downstream with have the same problems and Virginia Beach people, watch out, your water will be ruin. Navy and Air Force, you will have to drink water from somewhere else!


by Matthew McDermott, New York, NY on 07.23.09

In case you needed anymore convincing that mountaintop removal coal mining -- and dumping the waste in the streams and valleys surrounding the mine afterwards -- is an environmental (and social) nightmare, check out a new piece in Yale Environment 360. It really does a good job portraying the devastation:

Runoff Contaminates Water With Heavy Metals
Author John McQuaid describes what has happened in Laurel Branch Hollow, West Virginia,


“There used to be pine trees, and it was a very pretty shaded area. There was a nice trail that went up the hollow and I used to take my granddaughter up there and we’d go ginsenging [harvesting ginseng roots, an Appalachian custom] on up the hill,” says Miller, whose grandfather built the family homestead in 1920. “She really misses not being able to do that. She said, ‘Can’t we go someplace else? There’s no hills to climb there.’”

The remaining length of Laurel Branch, running past the house into the river, has become a sluice for contamination: As rainwater runs down Hobet 21’s dismantled mountainsides and fills, it picks up minerals and pollutants that damage delicate stream chemistry for miles downstream. Laurel Branch and multiple valley fills like it feed the Mud River, which is heavily contaminated with selenium, a heavy metal that works its way up through the food chain in ever-greater concentrations. One study has associated it with deformities — including curved spines and two eyes on one side of the head – found in fish larvae in a downstream reservoir.


Damage Really Can't Be Repaired
Recently the Obama Administration acted to more strictly regulate mountaintop mining operations, but McQuaid points out that the damage caused by these may never be able to be fixed... except over perhaps a thousand years,


Mountaintop removal does damage on both vast and microscopic scales, from hydrological changes over hundreds of square miles to effects on the life cycles of the tiniest stream microbes. Overseeing the repair of such damage is beyond the capabilities of any government agency; the most serious impacts — to streams — may be all but impossible to fix.

Margaret Palmer, a biology professor at the University of Maryland, was part of a team of scientists that compiled a comprehensive database of 37,000 U.S. river and stream restoration projects. She found no record of any mining-related stream-building project that could be called ecologically successful.

“Can you create these streams de novo, from scratch? There’s no evidence,” says Palmer, who testified on behalf of West Virginia environmental groups in a suit faulting the Army Corps of Engineers’ stream management. “Over thousands of years, I think you could do it. You have to have erosion of the land, get the hydrology back. I’m a restoration ecologist — I hope it can be done. But given how much damage they’ve done, right now I don’t think so.”


For why this is and more on why coal companies' efforts to rehabilitate areas they've damaged have been ineffective, check out the original article: Mountaintop Mining Legacy: Destroying Appalachia's Streams


http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/07/mountaintop-removal-coal-mining-stream-damage-1000-years-to-fix.php

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Experts tell Congress uranium mining near Grand Canyon risks polluting vital water supplies

Water experts: Mining near Grand Canyon is risky

WASHINGTON — Uranium mining near the Grand Canyon would court disaster, risking damage to critical water supplies, local officials and water experts told a House panel Tuesday.

A hyrdologist who has been conducting research on springs in the canyon for 25 years told the House Natural Resources Committee’s parks subcommittee that past mining polluted a stream that feeds the Colorado River, and that more pollution is likely should mining resume. A water utility manager said virtually all of Southern Nevada would be left without water supplies if a mining disaster should occur.

Two other scientists, however, said modern mining techniques have improved and development shouldn’t be prohibited because of past mistakes.

The committee is considering a bill by Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., that would permanently bar the filing of new mining claims on 1.1 million acres of federal lands north and south of the canyon. Renewed interest in nuclear power has led to a surge in uranium mining claims in the area.

There are as many as 10,000 existing mining claims on nearby federal lands for all types of hard-rock exploration and some 1,100 uranium mining claims within five miles of the canyon.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced Monday that he is barring the filing of new claims on nearly 1 million acres of U.S. Forest Service and other public lands for two years while the administration studies whether mining on those lands should be permanently prohibited.

Neither the legislation nor Salazar’s action would stop mining from going forward on claims already filed.

David Kreamer, a professor at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas, said his research found uranium levels three times greater than the Environmental Protection Agency’s recommended limit for water supplies in a canyon creek. He said the pollution is the result of mining that ceased more than a decade ago.

“I believe that an assumption that uranium mining will have minimal impact on springs, people and ecosystems in the Grand Canyon is unreasonable, and is not supported by past investigations, research and data,” Kreamer said.

Kay Brothers, the deputy general manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority, said her customers are almost entirely dependent on the river for their water supplies.

“That’s why we’re so concerned,” Brothers said. “You have to look at the potential for contamination to reach the river.”

However, Madan Singh, director of the Arizona Department of Mines and Minerals, said most of the present uranium contamination is the result of natural erosion, not mining.

“It’s important to separate real contamination issues from perceived contamination,” Singh said.

Karen Wenrich, a former geologist for the International Atomic Energy Agency, said the mining industry has “come a long way” and shouldn’t be punished for mistakes that took place when the risks of uranium were less well known.

Most of the claims for uranium are staked in the Arizona Strip, a sparsely populated area immediately north of the Grand Canyon National Park known for its high-grade uranium ore.

Operations in the area ceased some 20 years ago, when the price plummeted for uranium used for nuclear energy, weapons and medicine. With prices now around $55 a pound, the industry is eyeing restarting operations.

Toronto-based Denison Mines Corp. is about a year away from mining at a site about 20 miles from the canyon’s northern border if it secures an air permit with Arizona state officials.

On the Net: www.federalregister.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2009-17293(underscore)PI.p df www.doi.gov/documents/Petition(underscore)Application(underscore)for (underscore)Withdrawal.pdf

http://blog.taragana.com/n/experts-tell-congress-uranium-mining-near-grand-canyon-risks-polluting-vital-water-supplies-116242/

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Uranium Resources buys mineral rights

Comment: Is this the future of Virginia if uranium mining is allowed? Just think about this, someday, a driller will just come up to your land and start drilling boreholes!

Friday, July 17, 2009, 12:16pm CDT
Dallas Business Journal

Uranium Resources Inc. has signed a deal to purchase mineral rights on 113,000 acres of uranium-rich land in New Mexico.

Dallas-based Uranium Resources is buying the mineral rights from NZ Uranium in exchange for $1 million cash and four million shares of common stock along with future royalty considerations. The land is located in the Crownpoint area of New Mexico. The deal is expected to close in mid-August.

Uranium Resources (NASDAQ: URRE) estimates the acreage holds about 35 million pounds of uranium. The company already owns a 40 percent fee interest in one section of the Crownpoint land and previously leased other sections.

As a result of the deal, Uranium Resources will increase its New Mexico holdings to approximately 300,000 acres of mineral rights and more than 136 million pounds of uranium.

http://www.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2009/07/13/daily54.html?ana=from_rss

Friday, July 17, 2009

Pittsylvania County updating comprehensive plan

Comment: It seems Pittsylvania County should update their comprehensive plan more often, like every four years! Staying neutral on uranium mining, well maybe not? Oh, by the way, there are added comments by a blogger; it gives more information about the plan!

By John Crane
Published: July 17, 2009

CHATHAM — Pittsylvania County is updating its 18-year-old comprehensive plan, a document that covers an array of topics and provides a guideline for county development.

During a work session Thursday night, members of the Pittsylvania County Planning Commission reviewed a second draft of a revised plan. While county officials are still mulling what should go into a new comprehensive plan, one thing is certain — there will be no language expressing support or opposition to uranium mining in Pittsylvania County.

“This is not a position document,” said County Planner Greg Sides. “This is a general document on the future of the county.”

The county’s comprehensive plan must by law be impartial when it comes to mining and other issues, Sides said.

“It is a requirement of the plan to be neutral, general in nature,” Sides said. “State code outlines that.”

Virginia Uranium Inc. hopes to mine and mill a 119-million pound uranium ore deposit on Coles Hill six miles northeast of Chatham. VUI officials say the operation would bring hundreds of jobs to the area and generate needed tax revenue for the county. Opponents say it would destroy the environment, spoil the area’s beauty and threaten public health.

Planning Commission member Larry Welborn, who represents the Dan River district, said officials working on the document will have to stand their ground against interests demanding that the plan take a position on uranium mining.

Pittsylvania County aims to upgrade its state-mandated comprehensive plan for the first time since the county adopted it in 1991. The document covers a plethora of subjects relating to the county including quality-of-life, economic development, the natural and cultural environment, demographics, health care, housing, education, zoning, land use and growth management, transportation, public safety and other issues.

“It’s an all-encompassing document for the county,” said County Economic Development Director Ken Bowman. “It lays out their vision for the future.”

Welborn said he would like to see plenty of public input in drawing up the new plan.

“What we’re looking at is getting the county population more in tune with the visioning process,” Welborn said after the meeting.

Sides said the county expects to have the plan open to the public for comment in September. Sides said he hopes the Board of Supervisors would approve the plan by the end of the year.

Reader Reactions
on July 17, 2009 at 4:26 pm


I hope folks know that a comprehensive plan is not neutral on the suitability of various land uses for a county’s planning sectors.

As a policy plan (without the force of law), a comprehensive plan should state clearly the types of land uses desired or designated for an area (residential, light industrial, commercial, etc.) and provide language that could support later zoning changes to reflect the vision and goals established by the land use plan.

Comprehensive plans state the types of land uses that are appropriate and not appropriate for various planning areas.

As such, the PittCo plan can (if the community so desires) state that hard rock mining as a land use is not compatible with the policies that reflect the community’s long-term vision for the county.


http://www.godanriver.com/gdr/news/local/danville_news/article/pittsylvania_county_updating_comprehensive_plan/12510/

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Piketon Enrichment Plant Damaged In Storm


Comment: Virginia has plenty of bad storms, like today; just a certain part of our county had a small tornado and heavy rain! Wonder how many uranium mines or mills had tornado hit them or hurricanes?

By Laurie Omness
Published: July 11, 2009

PIKETON, Ohio—A spokesman for the Piketon Uranium Enrichment Plant in Pike County said that there had been some damage at the plant because of the tornado-like storm that swept through the county late Saturday afternoon.

However, according to public information officer Jack Williams, the damage has not affected the operation of plant.

Williams said engineers will look over the damage Sunday after it is light and determine how to proceed for repairs. He declined to describe the nature of the damage, saying officials wanted to see it in daylight.

A nearby resident described some damage to towers at the plant.

http://www.nbc4i.com/cmh/news/local/article/piketon_enrichment_plant_damaged_in_storm/19209/

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Korea Electric Power Corp Buys into Denison Mills

Comment: The uranium located in Pittsylvania County, Virginia according to the local (Canadian) uranium mining company should be mined because of America Security and it is our patriotic duty to mine uranium. Well, with all the countries acquiring stakes in Canadian uranium producers, will the Virginia uranium go to South Korea, China, Japan, or even a dangerous foreign country to build nuclear bombs? Say no to Uranium Mining and Milling in Virginia!

Story Published: Jul 5, 2009 at 6:00 AM EDT

South Korea's state-run power company has bought a 17-percent stake in a Canadian uranium producer, securing a stable source of fuel for its nuclear power plants, a report said.

Korea Electric Power Corp (KEPCO) acquired the stake from Canada's Denison Mines Corp for 68 million dollars, Yonhap news agency said.

KEPCO has also signed an agreement on a strategic alliance with the Canadian company, it said.

The deal will allow KEPCO to buy about 300 tons of uranium a year between 2010 and 2015, or nearly eight percent of South Korea's annual uranium consumption, it said.

KEPCO was allowed to appoint two board members of Denison Mines and participate in its mine sales or new investment projects, Yonhap said.

South Korea, which relies heavily on oil imports, has tried to diversify its energy sources. It has 20 commercial nuclear reactors which meet more than 30 percent of its electricity demand and plans to build more.

http://www.indianasnewscenter.com/news/business/49972642.html

Friday, July 3, 2009

Nuclear energy neither clean nor safe

Comment: People in Canada do not want uranium mining or nuclear power! Is that the reason for Canada to come south to take America's uranium? Canada, we are not welcoming your uranium mining, we do not want uranium mining in Virginia or anywhere else in America!

July 03, 2009
Re:Nuclear delay called risky,

July 1

Several assumptions need to be corrected. Canada's energy mix is 59.8 per cent hydro, 16.1 per cent coal, 11.6 per cent nuclear, 6.7 per cent oil, 4.9 per cent natural gas and 0.9 per cent renewables.

Hydro will continue to produce the same amount of electricity every year; however its proportion of the energy mix will decline due to net increases in demand. Wind generates power 30 per cent of the time, solar 20 per cent and other renewables 30 to 50 per cent.

Replacing all nuclear and fossil fuel energy sources with renewables by 2040 would result in this mix: 47.2 per cent hydro; 13.8 per cent wind; 7.2 per cent solar; 5.5 per cent tidal/wave; 23.1 per cent geothermal; 3.2 per cent other renewables, such as biomass and waste water.

This is a manageable expectation, especially in Ontario where we have made a commitment through the Green Energy Act. The GTA has made significant progress in both renewable sources of energy and energy conservation.

Renewable energy is clean, safe and cost effective. The same cannot be said about nuclear.

Uranium mining is not clean; the transport of radioactive materials is hazardous; waste management solutions do not ensure safety; and nuclear weapons proliferation is a serious threat.

Amy Collard, Natural Resources Critic, Green Party of Canada

http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/660100

Case Studies in Environmental Medicine (CSEM)

Case Studies in Environmental Medicine (CSEM)
Uranium Toxicity: Who Is at Risk of Exposure to Uranium?

Learning Objectives Upon completion of this section, you will be able to identify the populations most heavily exposed to uranium and describe who is at risk for uranium exposure.

Introduction : The occupations most heavily exposed to uranium are those employed in mining and milling operations, or in uranium enrichment and processing activities.

Communities living near Department of Energy (DOE) facilities and mining sites and those living in areas where naturally occurring uranium levels are elevated are most at risk for significant environmental exposure.

Past Occupational Exposures: In the past, uranium exposure has been associated mainly with mining and milling of the raw material, with workers engaged in uranium enrichment, and processing (DOE sites). In the 1980s, the United States stopped recycling and reprocessing uranium for antiproliferation purposes (other than for military fuel), increasing the need for mining and material production.

Past Paraoccupational Exposures: In the past, industrial hygiene practices may not have been adequate to protect workers from bringing contamination home with them, resulting in possible exposures to family members. At DOE sites in the 1950s, in particular, workers often did not know the hazards they were working with due to the secrecy of the atomic weapon projects. While it is expected that workers became more aware of the industrial hazards after the end of World War II, industrial hygiene practices in general did not improve significantly until the mid-1970s.

In addition, some releases from DOE facilities during the 1950s and 1960s may have exposed nearby communities to elevated levels of radiation, including uranium.

Current Occupational Exposures : Very little mining or processing of uranium for the purpose of fuel or weapons development is currently underway. Occupational activities with potential for uranium exposure include workers involved in using armor-piercing weapons,
decommissioning uranium-contaminated areas (e.g., handling wastes or debris suspected of containing uranium while decommissioning uranium contaminated areas),
processing nuclear fuel, maintenance and/or repair activities at applicable U.S. government facilities, mining or milling of uranium, silver, phosphorus, coal, etc., producing phosphate fertilizer, operating power plants, repairing, storing, transporting and using uranium weapons,
working with gyroscope, helicopter rotor counterbalances, or control surfaces of aircraft containing uranium metal weights, or using uranium-containing glazes as artists, hobbyists, and glass workers.

Direct Domestic Exposures: As noted earlier, the most common non-occupational exposures are primarily a result of drinking water, eating food, and breathing air contaminated by naturally occurring uranium sources.

Communities located near contaminated sites may be exposed through accidental releases during remediation activities. Essentially no uranium is released from nuclear power plants because of the fuel assembly design and the chemical and physical nature of the uranium oxide fuel [ATSDR 2008b].

Background Exposures: Background exposures to uranium occur throughout the United States and the world because uranium is a naturally occurring element in the soil, water, and air.

Average daily ingestion of uranium (both food and water) is estimated to be 3 micrograms (µg)/day in the United States. According to the Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, urine uranium levels were measured in a subsample of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants aged 6 years and older during 1999-2002.

The 95th percentile of urinary uranium concentrations was 0.034 µg/gram (gram) creatinine in the 1999-2000 survey years and 0.040 µg/g creatinine in the 2001-2002 survey years for the U.S. population aged 6 years and older [CDC 2009].

Key Points: Populations most heavily exposed to uranium are those employed in mining and milling operations, or in uranium enrichment and processing activities.

The most common nonoccupational exposures occur from exposure to naturally occurring uranium sources such as contaminated well water.

Links to non-federal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. These links do not constitute an endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC, ATSDR or the federal government, and none should be inferred. CDC and ATSDR are not responsible for the content of the individual organization Web pages found at these links.

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/uranium/u_whosat-risk.html

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Uranium's promise of economic prosperity rings hollow

Wednesday, July 1, 2009 9:41 AM EDT

Bringing uranium mining to Pittsylvania County, according to what we are told, will mean economic prosperity for our area beyond the wildest dreams of local economic development personnel.

According to the United States Energy Information Administration, there is one operating uranium mill for conventionally-mined ore in the United States.

Denison Mines Corporation operates the sole active mill, being White Mesa. Early in May, 2009, Denison announced White Mesa was being put on standby and would not process any more conventional uranium ore for the rest of the year 2009.

The president and chief operating officer of Denison Mines Corporation, Ron Hochstein, stated Denison had filled all of its contracts for uranium for 2009 and that the market price of uranium, known as the spot price, was lower than the cost of processing conventional uranium ore. (The spot price went up a whole 50 cents last week!)

The first quarter 2009 financial report for Denison Mines Corporation shows a net loss of $1.3 million and the annual financial statement for 2008 shows a loss of $80.6 million.

Ron Hochstein is also chairman of the board of directors of Santoy Resources Ltd, which, according to announcements, is the Canadian firm in the process of merging with the Coles Hill company, Virginia Uranium, Ltd. (Do look at the financial statements of Santoy, posted on its Internet corporate site.)

The United States and Russia currently have a policy of converting uranium from dismantled uranium bombs, etc., into nuclear fuel rods to keep the uranium out of the hands of terrorists, which reduces the market for mined uranium ore.

The U. S. company handling this project is USEC Inc., and the vice president of marketing and sales is John M. A. Donelson.

Whether or not this is the same person who wrote by that name a recent glowing letter to the Star-Tribune in support for uranium mining at Coles Hill, I do not know.

There are 35 states in the United States which have nuclear generated electricity, producing a total of 806,181,935 megawatt hours in 2008. This was a bit less than the 2007 figure.

There are applications for 20 additional nuclear plants, with the application status being "under review."

One might wonder how many, if any, of those will be built for years, if ever, in the currrent state of financing even with the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

Considering all of these factors, one might be justified in wondering just how many jobs over how long a period each year will result in Pittsylvania County from uranium mining and milling.

(The White Mesa Mill has been in operation since about 1980, including the period under another corporate name, and only has contracts sufficient for operation for four months out of 12?)

Hildred C. Shelton
Danville

http://www.wpcva.com/articles/2009/07/01/chatham/opinion/opinion03.txt

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Tide of toxic water poses health risk

"The water is half a metre from the surface and about to decant into the Vaal River system"
Comment: The same problems has happen out West and our future if uranium mining is approved in VA!

Bobby Jordan Published:Jun 27, 2009

Acid dissolves minerals in old mines
A river of acid water — enough to fill 600 swimming pools a day — has flooded old gold mines west of Johannesburg and is just days away from spilling over, causing an environmental disaster.

Natural ground water becomes highly acidic after flowing into old underground mines, where it dissolves heavy metals such as iron and uranium. In this form, it poses a health risk to humans and animals and damages the environment and agricultural land.

Long-term exposure to the poisoned water poses major health risks, including increased rates of cancer, skin lesions and retarded brain development.

An overflow of toxic mine water in the past led to radioactive contamination of Robinson Lake — a fishing and picnic area that has now become lifeless — outside Randfontein on the West Rand.

Acidic water is also dissolving huge areas of underground rock, threatening the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage site.

The rapid rise in the water level follows the partial closure of a water treatment plant outside Randfontein because of wrangling between the government and mining companies over the cost of cleaning up the toxic mess caused by mining, and the quality of water left behind.

Despite warnings from scientists, the toxic tide — called acid mine drainage — has filled an underground void called the western basin, which comprises hundreds of square kilometers between Krugersdorp and Randfontein, once the world’s richest gold mining area. The water is now half a metre from the surface and about to start decanting into the Vaal River system.

Acid water is also fast filling up two other underground caverns — a central basin beneath Johannesburg and Soweto stretching as far as Alberton, and an eastern basin beneath the East Rand as far as Nigel and Springs.

If left unchecked, this water could also decant and contaminate water that ultimately flows into the Orange River.

The looming crisis in the western basin has prompted a flurry of negotiations between the government and mining companies, which have set up a technical task team in the hope of avoiding a potential environmental disaster.

In the past, pumps kept gold mines outside Johannesburg largely free of water because most water was pumped to the surface, partially treated and released into rivers. Now many of the gold mines have closed or can no longer afford to keep pumping, and vast underground areas are filling up.

“It (the western basin) is the first gold basin that has filled and decanted — to overflow uncontrollably. That’s why it’s an issue,” said Rand Uranium senior consultant for sustainable development Rex Zorab. “It’s not like the central basin where there’s a huge void still to be filled,” he said.

At the heart of the problem are new water management regulations released this year, which direct mining companies to clean all pumped water to drinking-quality standard. Until now, they only partially treated pumped water before releasing it into the Vaal River system.

Mining firms said it would take at least two years to build a new water treatment plant to meet the government’s demands, at a cost of about R550-million. The government says the companies are nevertheless liable for environmental damage caused by discharging partially treated water — so the companies have reduced the amount of water they pump out.

The impasse involves three mining companies: Mintails, DRD Gold and Rand Uranium. Until recently, they treated 25 megalitres of acid mine drainage daily at two plants.

But a stalemate in negotiations over water quality prompted Mintails to partially close their treatment plant in April, causing water in the basin to fill up. It is now just days until acid water starts pouring out of an old mine shaft close to Randfontein — and spilling into the Tweelopie Spruit, which feeds into the Mooi River that supplies untreated water to Potchefstroom. The spruit also feeds into the Crocodile River.

Department of Water and Environmental Affairs spokesman Linda Page said: “They (the three companies ) have been given 90 days to stop discharging into the Tweelopie Spruit. Failure to do so will result in further action from the department.”

Mintails spokesman Basie Maree said: “We are committed to turn the water plant to full production once we have a clear directive on water quality standards and liability impacts.” jordanb@sundaytimes.co.za

http://www.thetimes.co.za/PrintEdition/Article.aspx?id=1024839

Monday, June 29, 2009

Underreported Struggles #27

Comment: Everyday all over the world people are fighting for their rights against uranium and gold mining, clean water and just to live on their land!

June 29, 2009 at 10:37am

In this Month’s Underreported Struggles:Nak’azdli First Nation goes to court, evicts company; Maya Protesters burn equipment at gold mine; Peru govenrment revokes laws after two months of protest;Australian Indigenous People burn, spear new government policy; Colombia Approves Involuntary Sterilization Program; US Gov FINALLY cleaning uranium on Navajo land

June 29 – UN agency ignores indigenous approach to knowledge protection – Once again, the United Nations has been accused of “shutting out” indigenous people — this time over approaches to protecting and sharing traditional knowledge and biological resources.

June 26 – Nak’azdli First Nation goes to court, evicts company – The Nak’azdli First Nation in British Columbia has filed a petition against the province, in an effort to defend their rights and block a copper and gold mine from being developed on their Traditional lands. The Nak’azdli will also be issuing and eviction notice to Terrane Metals, the company behind the mining project.

June 24 – Canada: Cold War-era radar sites to get $103M cleanup – It has taken nearly 40 years, but 16 abandoned radar sites that were part of the Mid-Canada line set up to monitor the Soviet air threat during the Cold War will be cleaned up over the next six years at a cost of $103 million. (background)

June 24 – US Gov FINALLY getting rid of uranium contaminated homes on Navajo land – The federal government is finally moving on its promise to remove and rebuild uranium-contaminated structures across the Navajo Nation, where Cold War-era mining of the radioactive substance left a legacy of disease and death.

June 23 – Statement from Ngobe communities affected by the Chan 75 Hydro dam – The Ngabe speak out against the CHAN 75 Hydro Project, urging the government of Panama to execute the precautionary measure adopted on June 17 by the Interamerican Court of Human Rights which consists of “suspending the construction and other activities.

June 23 – Colombia Approves National ‘Involuntary’ Sterilization Program – The Colombian House of Representatives has approved a program to convince Colombians to submit to sterilization. News of the bill arrives at the same time Peru ’s right-wing government announces it will shelve an investigation into that country’s former sterilization program, in which thousands of indigenous women were sterilized against their will in the 1990s, with help from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).

June 21 – Stop devastating the Karanpura Valley! – A unique palaeoarchaeological site dated over 8,000 years old, will be gouged out into 300-feet-deep mine pits running shoulder to shoulder down the Karanpura Valley, rendering the region incapable of supporting human or animal life.

June 20 – Bhutan: Villagers protest mining boom – About 40 indigenous people from various villages in Bhutan are speaking out against new quarries and other developments on their land. Among their concerns, they say blasting is threatening the safety of their children as well as an important religious site.

June 20 – Maya Protesters burn equipment at Guatemala gold mine – A group of Maya Mam villagers set fire to a pickup truck and an exploration drill rig, after the Canadian company Goldcorp repeatedly failed to remove the equipment off the community’s land.

June 19 – Peru revokes land laws, but the struggle continues – Yesterday Peru’s Congress overwhelmingly voted against two of the key land laws that sparked two months of protests, which culminated this month in a violent confrontation that left 34 dead and hundreds more injured and missing. Despite this important victory, the struggle is far from over.

June 17 – China: new protest over land development erupts in violence – Violence erupted between police and villagers protesting a land acquisition by the government, leaving around 18 people injured.

June 16 – Celebrity resort threatens isolated tribes – A luxury resort being built on the Andaman Islands in India is threatening the survival of the Jarawa tribe, who number just 320 and have only had contact with outsiders since 1998.

June 14 – Canada: What’s missing in Mining Act changes? The Right to Say NO – In response to proposed changes to Ontario’s Mining Act, Mushkegowuk Council, Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug and Ardoch Algonquin First Nation call on the province to respect the right of First Nations to say NO to all aspects of mining from prospecting to exploration to full mine development in their traditional territories.

June 13 – Over 250 indigenous people homeless in Bangladesh arson attacks – More than 250 members of Bangladesh’s indigenous Santal community were left homeless after attacks on their homes. Witnesses reported that as many as 300 men attacked the Santal, stealing and damaging their property, then setting their homes on fire.

June 12 – Australia: Indigenous Protesters burn, spear new government policy – Copies of the Northern Territory Government’s controversial funding policy for remote Indigenous communities have been burned and speared by Indigenous Peoples. Under the plan, funding would be kept at absolute minimum for 500 smaller communities, while they invest millions into 20 large communities with the aim of making them into towns – spelling the end for Indigenous Identity in those regions.

June 12 – NAFTA Tribunal recognizes Quechan sacred site – denies Glamis Gold’s claim – The only good thing to come of NAFTA. The Tribunal sided the with Quechan People and the U.S. Government who previously blocked Glamis Gold (now known as GoldCorp) from going ahead with a mining project on Quechan Lands.

June 11 – Outrage over WWF denial of indigenous rights around the world – Over 70 human rights and environmental groups from around the world expressed outrage at the planned launch of the World Wildlife Fund’s Aquaculture Stewardship Council last month. Influenced by the aquaculture industry, the WWF is completely ignoring indigenous people in six regions around the world.

June 10 – Victory for Tibetans blockading sacred site – Chinese authorities have come to an agreement with Tibetan villagers over a proposed gold mine in Mangkang county, occupied Tibet. The villagers have been protesting the mine since last April, out of concern that the mine would destroy a site they hold sacred. There was a tense standoff on the road leading to the site last month.

June 9 – Thousands of Karen Women and children flee Burmese military assault – Thousands of ethnic Karen have fled their camps in Burma for refuge in Thailand after an assault on their camps by the Burmese junta, according to a spokesman for the Karen and aid groups in the area.

June 9 – Nunatsiavut government refuses to lift uranium moratorium – the Nunatsiavut government in Canada has stated it has no intention of lifting its moratorium on uranium mining. The Inuit legislature put the ban in place one year ago, and it will continue for two more years.

June 8 – Cordillera: Tribes Fight To Keep Out Mining Corporation – Tribal elders in Cordillera, a province in the Philippines, are renewing a peace pact in a common effort to defend their lands from large-scale mining plans.

June 7 – New Mexico to Protect Mount Taylor – The cultural and natural resources of New Mexico’s Mount Taylor will now be protected by the state, ending a yearlong battle between American Indians and landowners concerned about preserving their rights to use the mountain without interference.

June 5 – Police violently attack peaceful indigenous blockade in the Peruvian Amazon – At 5:30 am this morning, the Peruvian military police staged a violent raid on a group of indigenous people at a peaceful blockade on a road outside of Bagua, in northern Peru. The blockade was part of a two-month-old National mobilization involving more than 1200 indigenous communities. Reports later revealed a total of 34 policemen and indigenous people died. Hundreds more were injured, and as many as 200 indigenous men and women were reported as missing.

June 5 – 360 Mískito communities secede from Nicaragua – representatives from 360 Mískito communities declared the secession of the entire Caribbean coast of Nicaragua, also known as the Mosquito Coast. They announced that the area, which accounts for 46% of Nicaragua’s territory and an estimated 11% of the population, would form the independent Nation of Moskitia.

June 4 – Indigenous communities in Venezuela seek land rights – The 12,000-strong Yukpa tribe complains that it is victim to a range of powerful business interests – from cattle ranchers to drug traffickers, fugitive Colombians and mulitinational mining groups. The Venezuela govenrment does little to assist the Yukpa.

June 4 – Doe Run Peru shuts down zinc and lead smelter in La Oroya! – US-owned mining company Doe Run has shut down its zinc and lead smelter, which has operated for the last 82 years. The smelter is located in the Peruvian town La Oroya, which is widely considered to be one of the most polluted places on earth.

June 2 – Ipperwash returned to Kettle and Stony Point First Nations – Today the government of Ontario returned Ipperwash Provincial Park to the Kettle and Stony Point First Nations, bringing an end to a saga that goes back to the 1930s. In memory Dudley George, who was killed by police in 1995 for defending his land, and his Brother Sam George, who passed away soon after this meeting.

June 2 – Ogiek tribe to become “conservation refugees” – The President of Kenya has stated plans to remove the Ogiek from their ancestral lands- in the name of “conservation.” More than 60 Ogiek leaders responded by saying they will resist any attempt at their removal.

June 2 – Baluch natives call to denuclearize Pakistan – With concerns rising over Pakistan’s horde of nuclear weaponry, a Washington-based education and advocacy group for the Baluch People begins a campaign to denuclearize Pakistan and stop the government from conducting further nuclear tests in the once-sovereign Nation of Baluchistan–now a province of Pakistan.

June 1 – Andean indigenous propose int’l tribunal for environmental crimes – Latin American indigenous peoples are proposing the creation of an international court to address actions which harm the environment. The tribunal would depend on the United Nations.

June 1 – Akwesasne Alert — blockade established by police – In the early morning of June 1, the Mohawk community of Akwesasne was blocked off by American and Ontario Police forces on either side of the border – as a result of Mohawk defiance of the order to permit the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) to carry lethal weapons.

Videos
Our Concerns About the Lower Sesan 2 Dam – In this video, villagers in northeastern Cambodia express their concerns about the proposed Lower Sesan 2 dam project. Located on the Sesan river in Cambodia’s Stung Treng Province Province, the Lower Sesan 2 will block two of the largest rivers in the Mekong River Basin, forcing tens of thousands of people to relocate.

Indigenous Resurgence and Traditional Ways of Being – Recommended viewing – University of Victoria Professor of Indigenous Governance Gerald Taiaiake Alfred talks about the “Resurgence of Traditional Ways of Being: Indigenous Paths of Action and Freedom.”

Jadugoda The Black Magic – This 10-minute documentary, based on the 2007 study “Black Magic of Uranium at Jadugoda” conducted by the Indian Doctors for Peace and Development (IDPD Patna chapter), explores the harsh realities of indigenous peoples living near the Jadugoda mine, mill and tailings dam in the mineral-rich Singhbum district of Jharkhand, India.

http://intercontinentalcry.org/underreported-struggles-27-june-2009/

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Company Seeks Ariz. Permit Mine Near Grand Canyon

Comment: What's up with the Canadians invading our country looking and mining for uranium? Most people out west have PAID a deadly price for the greed of corporations and the federal gov't and now Canada want to kill us? HECK NO, WE WON'T GLOW, DEMAND OUR LEADERS TO BAN URANIUM MINING THRU OUT AMERICA!

By (AP) FLAGSTAFF, Ariz.
Published: Sat, June 27, 2009 - 12:33 pm
Last Updated: Sat, June 27, 2009 - 1:05 pm
Short URL: http://wkrg.com/a/140938/

A Canadian company is one permit away from reactivating an Arizona uranium mine near the Grand Canyon where conservationists have been pushing for protection from new mining operations, a state official says.

Thousands of mining claims dot a 1 million-acre area around the canyon, but Arizona Department of Environmental Quality spokesman Mark Shaffer says only Denison Mines Corp. has a pending air permit with the agency for a site about 20 miles from the canyon's northern border.

Most of the claims for uranium are staked in an Arizona strip, a sparsely populated area immediately north of the Grand Canyon National Park known for its high-grade uranium ore. The silvery white metal is used in nuclear energy and weapons and for medicine.

If the permit is approved, Denison would be the first to restart mining at the Toronto-based company's Arizona 1 site, some 20 years after previous operations ceased.

The project could be a boon for some residents in Fredonia, a town of 1,000 closest to the mine. Many in the small town about 35 miles away are employed in the mining industry, and Mayor Dixie Judd said earlier operations provided an economic boost to the community that has three service stations and one restaurant.

"It just hasn't been what people perceive it to be," she said Friday, adding that the town's only bank closed shortly after previous uranium operations were shuttered.

Ron Hochstein, president and chief executive of Denison, said operations could begin within a year. A shaft already had been sunk at the mine, ventilation work was complete and agreements have been secured to sell the ore, he said.

"It would start ramping up once we receive the permit," he said.

The company also is seeking aquifer protection permits for its Pinenut and Canyon mines, 40 miles southwest of Fredonia and six miles southeast of Tusayan near the South Rim of the canyon, respectively.

Interest in reopening mines in the area is expected to rise following a public hearing on the permits next month in Fredonia, Shaffer said. The price for uranium has risen eight-fold since the 1980s, now selling at $55 per pound.

But nearby residents and environmentalists, who are pushing to ban new mining in the area, are worried about possible groundwater contamination, destruction of wildlife habitat and the transport of radioactive material. Some miners and their families have blamed exposure to uranium for deaths and health effects, including cancer and kidney disease.

The company plans to ship the ore from its three mines to a processing site hundreds of miles away near Blanding, Utah. Environmentalists say that without new environmental impact studies, residents along the trucking route won't have a say about the noise, traffic or dust from the ore escaping.

Kaibab Paiute Indian tribal administrator Tony Phillippe said members who live downwind from former nuclear testing sites have suffered enough from the exposure to nuclear dust. The reservation lies outside of Fredonia off State Route 89A where the ore would be trucked.

"I will not tolerate that type of invasion of the health of this community," he said.

Taylor McKinnon, the public-lands program director for the Tucson-based Center for Biological Diversity, said mining also could harm species in the area, including the endangered California condor and fish in the Colorado River. He said environmental analyses on the mines that were completed in the 1980s should be redone.

Environmentalists also have said that the mining would cause harm and that vertical columns below the ground would allow water from mining to flow downward, contaminating the water table below with uranium.

Hochstein, the Denison president, disputed those claims, saying that the company was not changing the ground structure.

"Those vertical lines have been there for millions of years, the water should be seeping down there already," he said.

ADEQ Director Ben Grumbles said the department recognizes that "uranium mining needs to be closely regulated and that adequate environmental safeguards must be in place before any work begins."

The department said Denison's air permit includes stringent monitoring and reporting requirements that would assure airborne dust from the mine and hauling operations are minimized.

Support from the state's congressional delegation has been divided. Democratic U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva's efforts to ban new mining claims and exploration on unproven claims have been blocked, while Arizona's two U.S. senators have said there was already an adequate balance of resource development and wilderness protection around the canyon.

Denison has staked 110 claims within the 1 million-acre area around the Grand Canyon and plans to produce nearly 110,000 tons per year of uranium ore at its Arizona 1 site over 10 years.

http://www.wkrg.com/associated_press/article/company-seeks-ariz.-permit-mine-near-grand-canyon/140938/Jun-27-2009_1-05-pm/

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Quebec Auditor General Agrees - Mining Companies Short Change Taxpayers

Comment: People all over the world are fighting uranium mining corporations and their greed, they never clean up the mess they make, they leave the land in shambles and people lives ruin ! Demand Virginia to ban uranium mining and milling now!

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Quebec Auditor General Agrees - Mining Companies Short Change Taxpayers
Further to my recent post on how one exploration company active in Quebec and BC last year walked away with $600K in taxpayer money, Quebec's Auditor General confirmed last April a number of facts about the impact of the mining industry in Quebec.

Some astonishing information:

* between 2002 and 2008, 14 of the 24 mining companies operating in Quebec paid zero royalties (in the same period, the annual output of Quebec’s mining sector was $4.2 billion)

*during that timeframe an average of 1.5 per cent of the gross value of Quebec’s mines was paid in royalties the industry paid $109 million for environmental remediation, while the actual costs of cleaning up abandoned mine sites was $352 million,

*leaving Quebec to pick up 69 per cent of the tab, or $243 million file reviews by the Auditor General revealed no trace of collaboration between the department of natural resources and wildlife and the department of sustainable development,

*environment and parks the objective of the Quebec government's encouragement and financial subsidies to the mining industry is job creation yet the employment in Quebec’s mining sector actually dropped by 17 per cent in the last 10 years Quebec is a bonanza for investors who get back in tax credits $716 for every $1,000 they invest in a mining company

*Quebec mines do not respect the three elements of sustainable development: projects must be economically sound, environmentally and socially acceptable to those living nearby

*In the National Assembly, junior minister Simard said the Charest government would introduce “very soon” a new mining strategy with three priorities: wealth creation, respect for the environment and developing mines with the local population.

This is the same mineral strategy that was announced but not delivered back in October 2007. Reportedly it is being released on Monday, June 29, 2009 and will be followed by "consultations" this summer and new legislation in the fall.

We'll see.

Asked for its reaction to the auditor general’s findings by the Montreal Gazette, the Mining Association of Canada did not return phone calls.

Given the circumstances and the general stresses in the Quebec economy, why should, I ask again, taxpayers be subsidizing investors in this sector? What is the "return on investment"? If jobs are being lost and companies are dumping the majority of their remediation costs back onto the average citizen while taking profits out of the province (in many cases) who is protecting the Quebec citizen?

The long overdue Mineral Strategy has a lot to answer for.

See the article in the Montreal Gazette: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Quebec+shortchanged+minerals+auditor+general/1470442/story.html

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Virginia opens door to uranium mining, OKs study

Comment: Blog mentions our Blog! Yes, we are against uranium mining and milling!!

Posted on June 22, 2009 by Nancy

A proposal to mine uranium in south-central Virginia advanced this week when a key state body approved a study of the matter. The targeted site is in Virginia’s Pittsylvania County just north of the city of Danville and close to the border with North Carolina’s Rockingham,

You can read the perspective of the company that intends to do the mining.


The Alliance opposes the mining.

The Southern Environmental Law Center says: Uranium occurs naturally in the ground, but when exposed to air and water, radiation is released into the environment. Virtually all uranium mining in the U.S. has occurred in the arid, sparsely populated regions of the West. In these areas and other parts of the world, uranium extraction and processing have caused serious problems, such as the contamination of groundwater and surface water and increased cancer risk for workers and the public.

There is no precedent for large-scale uranium mining in eastern states such as Virginia, where the population density puts more people at risk and where a wetter climate increases the chance of radiation contaminating streams and groundwater.

Virginia has no regulations for uranium mining, and the federal government has virtually no experience regulating the activity in a wet climate.

http://obxcommonground.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/virginia-opens-door-to-uranium-mining-oks-study/

Kepco finalizes acquisition of Denison stake

Comment: Denison Mines letting another foreign investor buy their stock! According to the local uranium company that their uranium will stay in America for their Nuke Plants...just another fairy tale from the local yokel uranium group( Canada) in Virginia!! We will not know where the uranium will go!

22 June 2009

Denison Mines and Korea Electric Power Corp (Kepco) have signed definitive agreements relating to the South Korean utility acquiring a 17% stake in the Canada-based uranium mining company, as well as an offtake agreement.

In April, the companies entered into a non-binding memorandum of understanding (MoU) under which Kepco would purchase one-fifth of Denison's U3O8 production and acquire a 19.9% stake in Denison for C$75.4 million ($62.2 million).

Under the newly-signed definitive agreements, Kepco will purchase 58 million common shares of Denison at an issue price of C$1.30 ($1.14) per share for proceeds of C$75.4 million ($65.9 million). As a result, Kepco would own some 17% of Denison's issued capital. The will also have the right to appoint two directors to Denison's board of directors.

In addition, Denison's chairman, Lukas Lundin, will also acquire 15 million common shares for an additional C$19.5 million ($17.1 million).

Denison and Kepco have also entered into a long-term offtake agreement which provides for the delivery to Kepco of 20% of Denison's annual U3O8 production, but not less than 350,000 pounds U3O8 (160 tonnes U3O8) annually, from 2010 to 2015. Denison has also granted Kepco an option, exercisable within 30 days from the closing of the equity financing, to purchase an additional 400,000 pounds U3O8 (180 tonnes U3O8) annually from 2011 to 2015. Under the agreement, the purchase price of the uranium that Kepco buys from Denison will be based on "industry standard terms."

The offtake agreement also provides that Kepco will purchase 20% of Denison's uranium production after 2015, subject to agreement on pricing and Kepco maintaining a 10% minimum shareholding in Denison.

Denison mines uranium in Saskatchewan, Canada, and in southwest USA. It also has ownership interests in two of the four conventional uranium mills currently operating in North America. In addition, the company is exploring properties in Mongolia and Zambia.

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/C-Kepco_finalizes_acquisition_of_stake_in_Denison-2206094.html

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Destroying Indigenous Populations


Most of the Sioux's land has been taken, and what remains has been laid waste by radioactive pollution. (Photo: Library of Congress)
Comment: White Oak Range sets behind my house! I remember seeing small round holes on White Oak Mt during the 1980's, after the other uranium company went all over our county drilling boreholes. However, one strange thing happens to me on another range. I was walking on the range; almost fell in a pit. The pit was square and about three ft. wide and it was deep! I just thought it might be a cave and now I think it was uranium well, like the one in the story. Therefore, if you walk on the White Oak Range is careful or you may fall in uranium well! Plus our Federal Gov't will sacrifice anyone for money!!

Saturday 20 June 2009

by: Dahr Jamail, t r u t h o u t Perspective


The Fort Laramie Treaty once guaranteed the Sioux Nation the right to a large area of their original land, which spanned several states and included their sacred Black Hills, where they were to have "the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation" of the land.

However, when gold was discovered in the Black Hills, President Ulysses S. Grant told the army to look the other way in order to allow gold miners to enter the territory. After repeated violations of the exclusive rights to the land by gold prospectors and by migrant workers crossing the reservation borders, the US government seized the Black Hills land in 1877.

Charmaine White Face, an Oglala Tetuwan who lives on the Pine Ridge Reservation, is the spokesperson for the Teton Sioux Nation Treaty Council (TSNTC), established in 1893 to uphold the terms of the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868. She is also coordinator of the voluntary group, Defenders of the Black Hills, that works to preserve and protect the environment where they live.

"We call gold the metal which makes men crazy," White Face told Truthout while in New York to attend the annual Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues at the United Nations in late May. "Knowing they could not conquer us like they wanted to ... because when you are fighting for your life, or the life of your family, you will do anything you can ... or fighting for someplace sacred like the Black Hills you will do whatever you can ... so they had to put us in prisoner of war camps. I come from POW camp 344, the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. We want our treaties upheld, we want our land back."

Most of the Sioux's land has been taken, and what remains has been laid waste by radioactive pollution.

"Nothing grows in these areas - nothing can grow. They are too radioactive," White Face said.

Although the Black Hills and adjoining areas are sacred to the indigenous peoples and nations of the region, their attempts at reclamation are not based on religious claims but on the provisions of the Constitution. The occupation of indigenous land by the US government is in direct violation of its own law, according to White Face.

She references Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

The spokesperson for the TSNTC declares, "We need our treaty upheld. We want it back. Without it we are disappearing. They might have made us into brown Americans who speak the English language and eat a different kind of food, and are not able to live with the buffalo like we are supposed to, but that is like a lion in a cage. You can feed it and it will reproduce, but it is only a real lion when it gets its freedom and can be who it's supposed to be. That's how we are. We are like that lion in a cage. We are not free right now. We need to be able to govern ourselves the way we did before."

Delegations from the TSNTC began their efforts in the United Nations in 1984 after exhausting all strategies for solution within the United States.

Homeland Contamination

There is uranium all around the Black Hills, South and North Dakota, Wyoming and Montana.


Mining companies came in and dug large holes through these lands to extract uranium in the 1950's and 1960's prior to any prohibitive regulations. Abandoned uranium mines in southwestern South Dakota number 142. In the Cave Hills area, another sacred place in South Dakota used for vision quests and burial sites, there are 89 abandoned uranium mines.

In an essay called "Native North America: The Political Economy of Radioactive Colonialism," political activists Ward Churchill and Winona LaDuke state that former US President Richard


Nixon declared the 1868 Treaty Territory a "National Sacrifice Area," implying that the territory, and its people, were being sacrificed to uranium and nuclear radiation.

The worst part, according to White Face, is that, "None of these abandoned mines have been marked. They never filled them up, they never capped them. There are no warning signs ... nothing. The Forest Service even advertises the Picnic Springs Campground as a tourist place. It's about a mile away from the Cave Hills uranium mines."

The region is honeycombed with exploratory wells that have been dug as far down as six to eight hundred feet. In the southwestern Black Hills area, there are more than 4,000 uranium exploratory wells. On the Wyoming side of the Black Hills, there are 3,000 wells. Further north into North Dakota, there are more than a thousand wells.

The Black Hills and its surroundings are the recharge area for several major aquifers in the South Dakota, Nebraska, and Wyoming regions. The crisis can be gauged from the simple description that White Face gives: "When the winds come, they pick up the [uranium] dust and carry it; when it rains or snows, it washes it down into the aquifers and groundwater. Much of this radioactive contamination then finds its way into the Missouri River."

She informs us that twelve residents out of about 600 of the sparsely populated county of Cave Hills have developed brain tumors. A nuclear physicist has declared one mine in the area to be as radioactively "hot" as ground zero of Hiroshima.

Red Shirt, a village along the Cheyenne River on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, has had its water tested high for radiation and local animals have died after consuming fish from the river.

After three daughters of a family and their mother died of cancer, a family requested White Face to have the municipal water tested. The radiation levels were found to be equal to those inside an x-ray machine. Little wonder then that the surviving sons and their father are afflicted with the disease. People procuring their grain and cattle from the region are advised to be extra cautious.

One cannot but feel the desperation of her people when White Face bemoans, "It's pure genocide for us. We are all dying from cancer. We are trying not to become extinct, not to let the Great Sioux Nation become extinct."

The Ogala Sioux are engaged in ongoing legal battles with the pro-uranium state of South Dakota. They are aware of the unequal nature of their battle, but they cannot afford to give up. White Face explains how "... Our last court case was lost before learning that the judge was a former lawyer for one of the mining companies. Also, the governor's sister and brother-in-law work for mining companies [Powertech] and a professor, hired by the Forest Service to test water run-off for contamination, is on contract with a company that works for the mining company. When I found out the judge was a lawyer for the mining company I knew we would lose, but we went ahead with the case for the publicity, because we have to keep waking people up."

Other tribes, such as the Navajo and Hopi in New Mexico, have been exposed to radioactive material as well. Furthermore, the July 16, 1979, spill of 100 million gallons of radioactive water containing uranium tailings from a tailing pond into the north arm of the Rio Puerco, near the small town of Church Rock, New Mexico, also affected indigenous peoples in Arizona.

Her rage and grief are evident as White Face laments, "When we have our prayer gatherings we ask that no young people come to attend. If you want to have children don't come to Cave Hills because it's too radioactive."

The exploitative approach to the planet's resources and peoples that led to these environmental and health disasters collides with White Face's values: "I always say that you have to learn to live with the earth, and not in domination of the earth."

Nuking the Colonies

The US government practices another approach. In occupied Iraq and Afghanistan, the uranium that has caused genocide of sorts at home has proceeded to wreak new havoc.

Two Iraqi NGO's, the Monitoring Net of Human Rights in Iraq (MHRI) and the Conservation Center of Environment and Reserves in Fallujah (CCERF) have extensively documented the effects of restricted weapons, such as depleted uranium (DU) munitions, against the people of Fallujah during two massive US military assaults on the city in 2004.

In March 2008, the NGO's were to present a report titled "Prohibited Weapons Crisis: The effects of pollution on the public health in Fallujah" to the 7th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council

Muhammad al-Darraji, director, MHRI and president, CCERF, was to present the report with an appeal, "We are kindly asking the High Commissioner for Human Rights to look at the content of the report in accordance with the General Assembly's resolution 48/ 141 (paragraph 4) of 20 December 1993, to investigate the serious threat (to the) health right in Fallujah and Iraq, and to relay the results of this investigation to the Commission on Human Rights to take the suitable decisions."

Attached to the aforementioned is another report co-authored by Dr. Najim Askouri, a nuclear physicist trained in Britain and a leading Iraqi nuclear researcher and Dr. Assad al-Janabi, director of the Pathology Department at the 400-bed public hospital in Najaf. Their report includes a section on the "Depleted Uranium Crisis" from Najaf, 180 miles from where DU was used in the First Gulf War.

Dr. Najim begins the report by noting that Coalition Forces, mostly US, used 350 tons of DU weapons in about 45 days in 1991, primarily in the stretch of Iraq northwest of Kuwait where Iraqi troops were on their retreat. Then, in 2003, during the Shock and Awe bombing of Baghdad, the US used another 150 tons of DU. He says that cancer is spreading from the conflict area as a health epidemic and will only get worse. The cancer rate has more than tripled over the last 16 years in Najaf.

According to Dr. Najim, "When DU hits a target, it aerosolizes and oxidizes, forming a uranium oxide that is two parts UO3 and one part UO2. The first is water soluble and filters down into the water aquifers and also becomes part of the food chain as plants take up the UO3 dissolved in water. The UO2 is insoluble and settles as dust on the surface of the earth and is blown by the winds to other locations. As aerosolized dust, it can enter the lungs and begin to cause problems as it can cross cell walls and even impact the genetic system."

One of Dr. Najim's grandsons was born with congenital heart problems, Down Syndrome, an underdeveloped liver and leukemia. He believes that the problems are related to the child's parents having been exposed to DU.

Detailing a skyrocketing rate of cancer and other pollution-related illnesses among the population of Fallujah since the two sieges, the report states, "Starting in 2004 when the political situation and devastation of the health care infrastructure were at their worst, there were 251 reported cases of cancer. By 2006, when the numbers more accurately reflected the real situation, that figure had risen to 688. Already in 2007, 801 cancer cases have been reported. Those figures portray an incidence rate of 28.21 [per 100,000] by 2006, even after screening out cases that came into the Najaf Hospital from outside the governorate, a number which contrasts with the normal rate of 8-12 cases of cancer per 100,000 people.

"Two observations are striking. One, there has been a dramatic increase in the cancers that are related to radiation exposure, especially the very rare soft tissue sarcoma and leukemia. Two, the age at which cancer begins in an individual has been dropping rapidly, with incidents of breast cancer at 16 (years of age), colon cancer at 8 (years of age), and liposarcoma at 1.5 years (of age)." Dr. Assad noted that 6 percent of the cancers reported occurred in the 11-20 age range and another 18 percent in ages 21-30.

"The importance of this information confirms there is a big disaster in this city.... The main civilian victims of most illnesses were the children, and the rate of them represents 72 percent of total illness cases of 2006, most of them between the ages of 1 month and 12 years.... Many new types and terrible amounts of illnesses started to appear [from] 2006 until now, such as Congenital Spinal cord abnormalities, Congenital Renal abnormalities, Septicemia, Meningitis, Thalassemia, as well as a significant number of undiagnosed cases at different ages. The speed of the appearance these signals of pollution after one year of military operations refers to the use of a great amount of prohibited weapons used in 2004 battles. The continued pollution maybe will lead to a genetic drift, starting to appear with many abnormalities in children, because the problems were related to exposure of the child's parents to pollution sources and this may lead to more new abnormalities in the f uture. According to the security situation with many checkpoints and irregular cards to allow the civilians to enter or exit the city until now, all this helps to continue the terrible situation for this time. Therefore, we think that all these data is only 50 percent of the real numbers of illnesses."

The Sioux tell their youth to avoid their radioactive native lands if they wish to procreate and prosper. Those in Iraq have no option but to lead maimed lives in their native land.

On February 4, 2009, Muhammad al-Darraji sent President Barack Obama a letter, along with the aforementioned report. A few excerpts are presented here:

"We have the honor to submit with this letter our report on the effects on public health of prohibited weapons used by the United States during its military operations in Fallujah (March-November 2004). It was our intention to present the report to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations on 4 March 2008, but both security and political reasons played a significant role in making this task impossible. The report, now in your hands, contains vast evidence and documentation on the catastrophic and continuous pollution in Iraq (to prevent) which nobody has taken any real action to help the victims or clean up polluted places. Some months ago, and in June 2008, I sent this report directly to some US congressmen. Two of them went to my town, Fallujah, and visited the general hospital to investigate the claims contained in our report. No substantial result came out of this visit. In February 2009 one of my colleagues, who worked in the hospital's statistical office and helped gather information about the pollution, was killed by unknown individuals. The blood of my friend is the driving force that led me to write to you directly in order for you to release the facts for which my friend paid with his life. Therefore, we are kindly asking you to look at the content of the attached report and to investigate the serious threats to the right to life of the inhabitants of Fallujah and other polluted places in Iraq, as well as to publicly release the results of this investigation under right of information about what really happened in Iraq."

The president has yet to respond.

Jason Coppola and Bhaswati Sengupta contributed to this article.


http://www.truthout.org/062009Y