Comment: just thought the article was interesting, Canada has weak environmental laws, ruins their air!!!
Tuesday, May 05, 2009 7:58 AM
Source: Canada Newswire)OTTAWA, April 30 /CNW Telbec/ - Greenpeace Canada and the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC) will launch Energy (R)evolution: A Sustainable Canada Energy Outlook:
When: Monday May 11, 2009
Time 07:45 am
Where: Sheraton Ottawa Hotel
Rideau Room
150 Albert St, Ottawa
RSVP: 613-567-9900 or info(at)deltamedia.com
This groundbreaking new report is a comprehensive look at the latest in Canada-specific solutions for dramatically reducing greenhouse gas emissions while growing our economy for the new century.
Greenpeace International's global Energy (R)evolution project is a world-wide plan to stop catastrophic climate change now. To bring the revolution home, Greenpeace Canada joined with the EREC to provide this solutions-based study that shows Canadians a way to dramatically reduce global warming emissions with the technology we already have.
Canada's climate policies are among the weakest in the world, and its emissions continue to increase. While Europe has agreed to greenhouse gas reductions of 20 to 30% by 2020, and the U.S. is aggressively forging a new green economy, the Canadian government continually lives up to its international reputation of being a climate villain.
Canada's Energy (R)evolution scenario is a blueprint for the transition to a clean, green energy supply, and Canadian governments have no excuse for inaction.
Members of the media are invited to attend the official launch of the report on May 11th at 7:45 AM at the Ottawa Sheraton Hotel. Breakfast will be provided.
Available for comment on the Energy (R)evolution
Christine Lins is the Secretary General of the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), the EU's largest association of renewable energy corporations. She is a graduate of the University of Linz, in Austria, and has more than 12 years of working experience in the field of renewable energy sources. She specializes in the management of international projects, and is a policy advisor on renewable energy.
Sven Teske is the primary author of Energy (R)evolution. He heads up the global Energy (R)evolution research project and is Director of Renewable Energy with Greenpeace International. He founded Greenpeace Energy, Germany's only cooperative in the power sector. He has published over 30 special reports about renewable energy, including Global Wind Energy Outlook, Solar Generation, and is a lead author for the Special Report on Renewable Energy, to be published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2010.
Dave Martin is a co-author of Energy (R)evolution and is the Climate & Energy Coordinator for Greenpeace Canada. He is a researcher, policy analyst and campaigner with 25 years of experience working on conservation, renewable technology, nuclear power, and climate change.
To RSVP or to find out more information, please contact the National Press Club of Canada 613-567-9900 or email info(at)deltamedia.com
http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/3218151
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
September 6, 2009, concerning the:
U.S. Uranium and Nuclear Power Outlook: 2008 - 2030
Presented to:National Research Council of the National Academies
Presented by:Tom Pool Chairman, International Nuclear
November 18, 2008
Although I could point out all of the obvious errors in this completely bias report BY THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY TO THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL of the NATIONAL ACADEMIES (NAS?), I will only address the section entitled: "Opposition"
This one section of the report serves to prove that the pro nuke, uranium mining & milling bunch, are frightened of, no, TERRORIZED by, the rational people that oppose their for profit slaughter of human beings (including children), animals and fish, and the environment all over the world. This section is a deliberate attempt to subliminally effect the emotions of the reader.
It attempts to make anybody opposed to nuke power, uranium mining and milling, seem like a group of paranoid fanatics. It is meant to gain pro-nuke, pro-uranium mining & milling followers by deliberately creating the mind set: "if I oppose this, I will be labeled and vilified. Worse, I will be considered stupid (remember the old story: "The Emperor's new clothes"?). It is marketing and public relations at it's best. In professional terms, it's called "branding". Although typical branding is done to create positive "top of mind awareness" in the mind of the consumer - in this case, the NRC of the NA (NAS?) - this marketing, PR drive is determined to create a negative impression of anyone that dares oppose the for profit corporations as represented by Tom Pool, Chairman, International Nuclear.
So, without further ado, please let me address the picture that he paints of the "opposition":
In Tom's own words: "Most opposition can be Characterized as":
– Lack of Understanding (Fear of the Unknown) This is true. Based on the problematic history of nuclear power, uranium mining and milling world wide, the current problems and issues (more are discovered every day), the lack of any new technology that significantly improves the probability of successful nuclear power generation, uranium mining and milling, and the fact that uranium mining and milling has never been done any where in the world with the climate and population density of Virginia, creating a HUGE UNKNOWN that can NEVER be addressed, except as theory - making Virginia the biggest potential experiment in nuke energy fuel production EVER in the history of the United States - we , the people that rationally oppose this boondoggle, proudly lay claim to NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS, IN OFFICE TO LOOK AFTER OUR WELL BEING, NOT THE PROFITS OF CORPORATIONS HELL BENT TO TAKE OVER OUR LANDS AND TRAMPLE ON OUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS, PUSH THE AGENDA OF FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS (even foreign corporations) INSTEAD OF LOOKING OUT FOR THE PEOPLE THEY WERE ELECTED TO, AND ARE PAID TO, REPRESENT.
Yes, we are fearful that our elected officials are so beholding to for profit (even foreign) corporations that they will NEVER listen to the will of the people. They (the politicians) claim that this is "business" as usual (taking money from corporations to pay for their election campaigns). I say IT'S TIME TO CHANGE THE WAY WE DO BUSINESS!
We, the opposition, do not need to look very hard to find all of the reasons that nuke power, uranium mining and milling, should not be done! OUR POLITICIANS NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS NOT UP TO THEM TO DECIDE IF NUKE POWER, URANIUM MINING & MILLING SHOULD BE DONE. This decision is up to the people. Their ONLY job is to implement the will of the people. If they cannot handle this simple task, it is time for us - THE PEOPLE - to vote them out of office! We need politicians that KNOW they do not work for corporations, domestic and/or foreign! They need to understand, they work for us! Just because WE elected them to office, WE did not give them Carte' blanch to do whatever they want to do. WE also did not agree to serve THEM.
THE CORPORATIONS and THEIR PUPPETS, our elected officials, HAVE GONE OUT OF THEIR WAY TO STIFLE THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH THEM. They call us names, they emotionally and defensively challenge our facts without providing any new or better information. Our politicians hide behind questionable "studies" so that they can justify serving their corporate masters. They make stop overs and declare that a proposed, potentially lethal to millions uranium mine & mill is "far away from everything"! They (the politicians) expect you to accept this declaration as an item of fact. Never mind that a look at any map will give truth to their lies! They refuse to take a stand on the most important issue that Virginia has ever faced. There has not been an assault like this on the people's rights since the war of Northern Aggression! Our politicians have become the "bully" on the beach.
• Connection With Nuclear Weapons DUH! Uranium is processed into weapons grade material to create nuclear bombs! Depleted uranium (the spent, or used up uranium power rods from domestic nuclear power plants) is used to coat bombs and the ordinance used in conventional weapons (riffles, hand guns, etc.). These depleted uranium bunker busters, and gun ordinance that our soldiers carry, have been reported to have been, and continue to be, used extensively in the USA's middle east wars - Iraq & Afghanistan. Our military is coming home with the effects of this low level radiation poisoning as we speak. That is, if they're lucky enough to come home at all. If we should be fighting these wars or not is a subject for another discussion. As for a "connection with nuclear weapons", there can be no doubt.
Our Federal, State, and Local Governments (our elected servants) would like for us to believe that there is no danger from the nuke industry at any phase of it. Do the minimum of research and you will find that this is absolutely not true, A LIE! They (the politicians that work for the foreign and domestic corporations) would like for us to believe that we need nuclear energy to solve our domestic energy problems in terms of production of energy, and cost for that energy. They tout nuke energy as renewable, clean and affordable. This is THE BIGGEST LIE! Our existing nuclear energy production facilities (nuke plants) are at, and/or, reaching the end of their safe operating life cycles. There are new nuke plants on the table, but none of them are in, or anywhere close, to the beginning of construction. Why? (1) Private banks will not finance them because of the risks (financially, environmentally, and long term return on investment) without 100% loan guarantees from OUR federal government. That would be TRILLIONS of DOLLARS, our (the tax payers) dollars, invested in a non-renewable, 20 year max resource. (2) Although the industry has tried, there is no "cookie cutter" physical plant plan to mass produce nuclear power generation plants. ALL nuke plants must be individually engineered (meaning no economy of scale = MORE DOLLARS TO BUILD, including the inevitable cost over-runs) per location. Of the 30 or so plans currently under consideration, none of the future nuke plant blueprints have been approved. They simply do not meet the requirements of the authorizing governmental agencies.
So, if our existing nuke plants will all be shut down in a very few number of years, and new nuke plants, even if authorized to be built starting today, cannot come on line for at least 10 - 30 years, providing that they can get financing (which they can't - that's why some power companies in the USA are increasing their prices for electricity - they need to build a fund), why do we need uranium mining and milling at Cole's Hill or any other place in America? Why is the USA selling off excess uranium? We know why the USA imports uranium! It's to keep the bad guys from getting it. This is why Russia has such a lucrative deal with the USA to provide us with around 20% of our uranium needs. We need to corral their uranium stock piles to keep them from going to unfriendlies (to the United States) that will use the uranium to develop nuke and depleted uranium weapon capabilities. This is our (our government, not necessarily representing the people) nuke power problem with countries like Iran. They claim to want a domestic source of nuke energy, but do they? We (our government) claims to want a domestic nuke energy program, but do we (them, the corporation's paid for politicians)? In light of all of the other, truly sustainable, truly "green" Tree Hugger options for domestic energy - including the idea of pouring the nuke trillions of dollars into decentralizing our power supplies by investing in property by property energy independence through solar, wind, etc., that could then provide excess power into our centralized grid - why would we (the people) put up with the archaic, so yesterday, anti people and environment methods of power production that will give us they same old, same old? Sounds like a recipe for functional obsolescence. The same functional obsolescence that killed our auto industry. Something is NOT right. But, I'm sure that, as Tom promotes, we are too stupid to figure it out. After all, a bunch of ignorant rubes should not have anything to do with running the country. Leave that to the governmental experts!
• Chernobyl & Three Mile Island More "Lack of Understanding" and "Fear of the Unknown"? You bet! The ignorant masses, otherwise known worldwide as the "Opposition", do not understand how Chernobyl & Three Mile Island could have happened in light of governmental and corporate assurance that all was well, that melt downs could not possibly happen! In the case of Three Mile Island, the corporate lackeys (otherwise known as our elected government officials) led us to believe that there couldn't possibly be any danger because Three Mile Island was/is extremely well regulated and controlled. Inspections would/will surely find any potential problem(s) and make sure that it never causes any serious situations. Less serious problems, based on what is allowed to be a problem by regulations, will (and do) happen, but these problems will only effect a small number of people, lands, and water ways. If these people are scared, they can move - nobody is stopping them. Nobody is forcing them to live in the proximity of a major life threatening catastrophe waiting to happen. The people living in the area knew the risks - there was plenty of debate with the stupid opposition - why did they stay? I'm sure (as Walter Coles Jr. said to me in one of VUI's private presentations) that there was a boom in the real estate prices when uranium, I mean, nuke industry people moved in to fill well paying jobs. Why didn't they sell then? Idiots! I guess they just didn't understand! Guess they're not afraid enough of what "they don't know" to do the smart thing and leave. Because information about Three Mile Island, and every other nuke power plant and uranium mining and milling operation all over the world is readily available to anyone that really wants to know the truth. The pro nukers, miners & millers are not responsible for the ignorance of the masses! Their ignorance is proof as to why corporations, through their elected governing officials, should rule.
– Prejudice BRAVO! What a GREAT MARKETING, PUBLIC RELATIONS WORD to label the "Opposition" with! The word "prejudice" brings to mind ignorant people that are racist and more. Think "Neo-Nazis, Rednecks, Hicks, Stupid, Country Bumpkins, Politically Incorrect (OH NO! NOT POLITICALLY INCORRECT!), etc.
The pro nuke, uranium mining and milling people will try to convince you that anyone opposed to them, you know, the prejudice people that do not want nuke power, and by extension uranium mining and milling, and because, for some reason we are opposed to progress, are just, well, prejudice. Wish I would have thought of this for our opposition campaign! But then, I don't have a Million Dollar Plus (provided by foreign corporations) PR and Marketing budget. If I had thought of this label, I would have said that the pro folks are prejudice against truly sustainable, healthy electric power generation. Oh well! They thought of it first. Guess I'll just try to convince folks to be "discerning" when looking at the issues.
– Mysticism I am indeed mystified! I think it's "magic" the way the pro-nuclear, pro-uranium mining and milling folks twist and ignore the facts. I find it fascinating that they always come up with the money to get their way. I must suspend my disbelief when watching the slight of hand that happens when their lobbyists lobby (that's what they do. A lobbyist's job is to get an elected public servant to do a corporations will) OUR elected officials. Perhaps the corporations have hired an untold number of hypnotists? I can see it now... the room is dark, all eyes are on the lobbyist/hypnotist... the smell of money is wafting through the room (you know, for ambiance), and the lobbyist/hypnotist says: " You are all very greedy..., you all love money and power (rumor has it that you can't hypnotize someone to do anything that they are not already inclined to do)... you will all vote for a "study"..., you will all vote for uranium mining and milling in Virginia... When you awake at the count of three, you will not experience any remorse... You will not worry or think about your lack of personal fact finding... despite the fact that you have many personal aides that could do this for you... at tax payer expense..., Tax payers are only there to provide money for your wants and needs ..., You will be relaxed, happy, and rich... 1.., 2..., 3.....
– Political Positioning You are smart people, despite what Tom thinks! Need I say anything more on this topic? If your answer is yes, I still think that you're smart, but a glutton for punishment.
– Over Reaction I know that many people wrestle with this. What is the "proper" amount of reaction? How should it be expressed? When is it "under reaction"? How can we possibly know in this age of "blip" communication, where we might be misunderstood? What is the "proper" means to react? Who will give us the answers to these profound questions? Are the pro-nuke, uranium mining & milling folks causing us to "react"? If not, who is? Why have I never thought about these issues until VUI/Santoy/Virginia Energy Resources, INC. (whatever they call themselves this week) expressed the desire to make Billions of Dollars by mining and milling uranium in Pittsylvania County? Do the pro-uranium mining & milling folks have the answers? Didn't Walter Cole's say that HE would decide if uranium is mined and milled in Pittsylvania County (and the rest of VA by extension) publicly when he was quoted in many newspapers throughout Virginia as saying "if it can't be done safely, it won't be done"? Did I get short changed on information regarding Walter's qualifications to make this decision for the rest of us? Henry Hurt is quoted as saying: "If we can put a man on the moon, surely we can figure out how to safely mine (and mill) uranium (in the Commonwealth)". I know Henry is smart, but isn't this two different things? Isn't Tom's presentation to the NRC to the NA (NAS?) full of opinion and hyperbole, designed to discredit anyone with questions, never mined opposed to, nuke power, uranium mining & milling? Somebody! Please help me to react appropriately to this demeaning, paid for by the nuke industry, presentation! I'm at a loss... of knowledge as to the correct amount of reaction I should have to this insulting presentation, and the lack of indignation from MY elected officials, and... money to present real facts by people that are rightfully opposed to nuke energy, uranium mining and milling (STRONG PRESENTATIONS WITHOUT APOLOGY!).
I don't have a Million Dollar Plus marketing & Public Relations budget. I only have this one little blog and the goodwill (if I become a "story") of the media. Perhaps Tom will help me to react appropriately...
– Media Sensationalism MY EXPERIENCE IS THAT THE "MEDIA" TYPICALLY DOES NOT "SENSATIONALIZE"!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Except for editorial opinion pieces that can make, or break a movement that "they" don't approve of (let the "media" - Danville Register & Bee - figure out what I mean by this). Typically, the "media" reports. That's their job. You will always have young, cub reporters (think John Crane) that, if there is nothing newsworthy that's sensational, will create sensation in how he chooses to report. This "killing of the Golden Goose" is how these young reporters, to their chagrin, think that they can create a "story" worth printing. Anyone that has undergone "how to deal with the media 101" in corporate training knows to watch out for this. Even so, sometimes you get blind-sided by an overzealous, trying-to-be-up-and-comer reporter.
It's up to the "warring factions" to make news, and "sensationalize" a subject. The media coverage of dissenting voices is Tom's topic in this presentation to the NRC of the NA (NAS?). My opinion is that Tom is warning the "media". He's telling them to print only the pro-nuke, pro-uranium mining and milling perspectives or risk the wrath of the "powers that be".
Unless, of course, they are favorably reporting the pro side of things! Some "media" might be happy with that. Unfortunately, the era of true investigative reporting has gone the way of the dinosaur. It's much more cost effective to "stir the pot" than to truly dig in and uncover the facts! If this is not true, let the "media" prove me wrong. Let the "media" not make decisions about content based on advertising dollars. Let the "media" prove that "news" and "investigative journalism" is based on issues independent of ratings, readership, advertising (real or potential) dollars, and political influence. Let the "media" win back the respect that it once had. This is the ONLY way that the "media" can counter the charge of "media sensationalism" leveled by the pro-nuke, pro-uranium mining & milling industry.
– Mistrust of Government Regulators Let's see... where to begin... No matter which side of the aisle you are on, all of us can list a multitude of sins (some listed in this editorial) that cause us, as individuals and groups of people, to not trust "The Government". Why is that? Why is it that the only constituency that does trust "The Government" has names that end in INC. and LLC? Could it be that these "people" know something that we don't?
Look, there are plenty (a majority) of companies and corporations, both for-profit and not-for-profit, that are "good corporate citizens". Indeed, non-profits (such as The Alliance, CELDF, SCC, United Way, Kids & Kritters to name a few) could not exist without the American corporate structure. There would also be many (vastly many) jobs that would not exist without small, for-profit enterprises. But, let's be realistic! None of these not-for-profit and small for-profit corporations can dictate "government regulations" like national & international corporations can.
Surprise! Our elected and appointed government officials DO NOT dictate "government regulations" So, who does dictate "government regulations"?
Big corporations. Not local Mom & Pops. Really HUGE corporations. The kind of corporations that put local (including regional and some state wide) businesses out of business! These conglomerates, often financed from foreign (not American) resources, such as VUI/Santoy/Virginia Energy Resources - a wholly owned CANADIAN corporation - have the financial resources to buy anything they want! Including our government. How do they do this? They have a multi-prong approach (just go to the Canadian stock exchange to see what Walter & company is up to). They promote their cause publicly through the media and charitable donations. In fact, they put millions of dollars (don't believe for one minute the "small company" poverty plea of VUI, "America") into "Public Education, Public Relations, Advertising, and Marketing campaigns".
They hire the best, high powered lobbyists that they can afford (trust me, they have the best). These lobbyists write the proposed legislation. Remember, it was Whitt Clement, Brother-In-Law to Walter Coles, (the man that has taken it upon himself to decide if uranium mining & milling is "safe" on his property - he owns the biggest share of the ore that, when mined & milled, will pay him, at minimum, Millions. The ore is estimated to be worth Billions as long as there is a domestic world wide nuke energy market for it. No wonder VUI's private presentations focus on the nuclear industry instead of the local issue of uranium mining & milling. In fact, you really can't get them - VUI - to talk much about the local issue of uranium mining and milling) and a renowned Richmond lobbyist that convinced VA Senator Frank Wagner to include uranium mining and milling in his 2006 energy bill, later adopted by the Governor of Virginia. We (the people) have been under the threat of this scourge on humanity ever since. We, the people, NEVER asked for this controversy. Walter Coles and his investors forced this controversy on us, against our will. They have manipulated the General Assembly, the Coal & Energy Commission (not an elected panel, but an appointed panel responsible to, and reporting to no one. So, what's in this for them?), and the media to achieve their goals. The nuke industry, in full support of uranium mining and milling, manipulates through presentations like Tom's to the national government, and appointed governmental bodies such as the NRC of the NA (NAS?), and the media. The nuke industry also forces it's propaganda on unwitting citizens through paid advertising and the intimidation... I mean manipulation... of the "media".
Have I mentioned that industries such as nuke energy and mining of every kind - including uranium mining and milling - are the ones that write the regulations? Sad, but true. Our government (the elected people that supposedly represent you and me) consider the industry people the experts in the field. Therefore, our elected officials abdicate their responsibilities to protect us poor dumb citizens to the very people that are in the business to make money. This is where the idea of "cost benefit analysis" comes from. Big corporations analyze their potential financial exposure concerning breaking their own "regulations". The regulations that they had their elected officials put in place. If their analysis determines that it is more profitable to "break the regulations", also known as committing an illegal act, they will do so. After all, they know the rules (that they made) and repercussions much better than anyone else. It's their business to know!
This finally brings us to the idea that people have a "mistrust" of government regulators. Duh! Why should we trust government regulators when they work for the very corporations that they are supposed to regulate. At best, they will find wrong doing and impose the sanctions that the regulated industry has approved, creating a profitable (but not healthy) situation for all (of them) concerned. Even if a regulatory agency wanted to do its job for the people, they DO NOT have the money. Want proof? Take a look at how many inspectors there are, per state, and how many bridges per state they are required to "regulate", inspect, keep safe for the citizens. It makes me cringe every time I cross one. It's not the inspector's fault, it's the government's fault. It's not the government's fault, it's the people's fault. In this case, the "people" does not include corporations.
Corporations are only "people" when it comes to "their" (whoever "they" are) rights. Funny how corporation rights always trump people's rights. Its like corporations have the same number of votes that every counted-in-the-census human being has, times two! Now we're back to mysticism. I think this has something to do with the smell of money in the room whenever big corporations influence... I mean talk to their... I mean our, elected government officials.
Trust the regulators? I think not! We, THE PEOPLE, have plenty of reason to not trust them.
So, the call to action? I challenge every person (not corporations, but including their elected officials) to do the following:
Marline held 40,000 acres in Pittsylvania County alone! Coles Hill will only be the FIRST mine! YOU'RE NEXT!
This is a chart showing you how uranium mining & milling dust and leaching enters our environment causing you to breathe and ingest it.
Call Radon Free or click to visit their web site
Coming Soon to Chatham, VA?
Working Together for Our Inherent Governing Authority! Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate systematical job of reducing us to slaves." --Thomas Jefferson
Coal Ash: 130M Tons of Waste
FACT: Uranium mining & milling produces tailings and dust that contain the same deadly heavy metals and arsenic as coal ash. Coles Hill is on the Banister River, just like the coal ash spill in Kentucky polluted their river. The plan in Virginia is to develop "regulations" to keep us "safe" from the uranium industry just like they (politicians and the corporations that are motivated solely by profit) have kept the people "safe" from the coal plant industry. When you watch this film, every time you hear COLE ASH, think URANIUM TAILINGS and DUST!
Watch CBS News Videos Online
The Facts About Uranium
A Call to Action!
Sunday, September 6, 2009
A CALL TO ACTION!
An Editorial by Gregg Vickrey, Chairman, The AllianceSeptember 6, 2009, concerning the:
U.S. Uranium and Nuclear Power Outlook: 2008 - 2030
Presented to:National Research Council of the National Academies
Presented by:Tom Pool Chairman, International Nuclear
November 18, 2008
Although I could point out all of the obvious errors in this completely bias report BY THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY TO THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL of the NATIONAL ACADEMIES (NAS?), I will only address the section entitled: "Opposition"
This one section of the report serves to prove that the pro nuke, uranium mining & milling bunch, are frightened of, no, TERRORIZED by, the rational people that oppose their for profit slaughter of human beings (including children), animals and fish, and the environment all over the world. This section is a deliberate attempt to subliminally effect the emotions of the reader.
It attempts to make anybody opposed to nuke power, uranium mining and milling, seem like a group of paranoid fanatics. It is meant to gain pro-nuke, pro-uranium mining & milling followers by deliberately creating the mind set: "if I oppose this, I will be labeled and vilified. Worse, I will be considered stupid (remember the old story: "The Emperor's new clothes"?). It is marketing and public relations at it's best. In professional terms, it's called "branding". Although typical branding is done to create positive "top of mind awareness" in the mind of the consumer - in this case, the NRC of the NA (NAS?) - this marketing, PR drive is determined to create a negative impression of anyone that dares oppose the for profit corporations as represented by Tom Pool, Chairman, International Nuclear.
So, without further ado, please let me address the picture that he paints of the "opposition":
In Tom's own words: "Most opposition can be Characterized as":
– Lack of Understanding (Fear of the Unknown) This is true. Based on the problematic history of nuclear power, uranium mining and milling world wide, the current problems and issues (more are discovered every day), the lack of any new technology that significantly improves the probability of successful nuclear power generation, uranium mining and milling, and the fact that uranium mining and milling has never been done any where in the world with the climate and population density of Virginia, creating a HUGE UNKNOWN that can NEVER be addressed, except as theory - making Virginia the biggest potential experiment in nuke energy fuel production EVER in the history of the United States - we , the people that rationally oppose this boondoggle, proudly lay claim to NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS, IN OFFICE TO LOOK AFTER OUR WELL BEING, NOT THE PROFITS OF CORPORATIONS HELL BENT TO TAKE OVER OUR LANDS AND TRAMPLE ON OUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS, PUSH THE AGENDA OF FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS (even foreign corporations) INSTEAD OF LOOKING OUT FOR THE PEOPLE THEY WERE ELECTED TO, AND ARE PAID TO, REPRESENT.
Yes, we are fearful that our elected officials are so beholding to for profit (even foreign) corporations that they will NEVER listen to the will of the people. They (the politicians) claim that this is "business" as usual (taking money from corporations to pay for their election campaigns). I say IT'S TIME TO CHANGE THE WAY WE DO BUSINESS!
We, the opposition, do not need to look very hard to find all of the reasons that nuke power, uranium mining and milling, should not be done! OUR POLITICIANS NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS NOT UP TO THEM TO DECIDE IF NUKE POWER, URANIUM MINING & MILLING SHOULD BE DONE. This decision is up to the people. Their ONLY job is to implement the will of the people. If they cannot handle this simple task, it is time for us - THE PEOPLE - to vote them out of office! We need politicians that KNOW they do not work for corporations, domestic and/or foreign! They need to understand, they work for us! Just because WE elected them to office, WE did not give them Carte' blanch to do whatever they want to do. WE also did not agree to serve THEM.
THE CORPORATIONS and THEIR PUPPETS, our elected officials, HAVE GONE OUT OF THEIR WAY TO STIFLE THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH THEM. They call us names, they emotionally and defensively challenge our facts without providing any new or better information. Our politicians hide behind questionable "studies" so that they can justify serving their corporate masters. They make stop overs and declare that a proposed, potentially lethal to millions uranium mine & mill is "far away from everything"! They (the politicians) expect you to accept this declaration as an item of fact. Never mind that a look at any map will give truth to their lies! They refuse to take a stand on the most important issue that Virginia has ever faced. There has not been an assault like this on the people's rights since the war of Northern Aggression! Our politicians have become the "bully" on the beach.
• Connection With Nuclear Weapons DUH! Uranium is processed into weapons grade material to create nuclear bombs! Depleted uranium (the spent, or used up uranium power rods from domestic nuclear power plants) is used to coat bombs and the ordinance used in conventional weapons (riffles, hand guns, etc.). These depleted uranium bunker busters, and gun ordinance that our soldiers carry, have been reported to have been, and continue to be, used extensively in the USA's middle east wars - Iraq & Afghanistan. Our military is coming home with the effects of this low level radiation poisoning as we speak. That is, if they're lucky enough to come home at all. If we should be fighting these wars or not is a subject for another discussion. As for a "connection with nuclear weapons", there can be no doubt.
Our Federal, State, and Local Governments (our elected servants) would like for us to believe that there is no danger from the nuke industry at any phase of it. Do the minimum of research and you will find that this is absolutely not true, A LIE! They (the politicians that work for the foreign and domestic corporations) would like for us to believe that we need nuclear energy to solve our domestic energy problems in terms of production of energy, and cost for that energy. They tout nuke energy as renewable, clean and affordable. This is THE BIGGEST LIE! Our existing nuclear energy production facilities (nuke plants) are at, and/or, reaching the end of their safe operating life cycles. There are new nuke plants on the table, but none of them are in, or anywhere close, to the beginning of construction. Why? (1) Private banks will not finance them because of the risks (financially, environmentally, and long term return on investment) without 100% loan guarantees from OUR federal government. That would be TRILLIONS of DOLLARS, our (the tax payers) dollars, invested in a non-renewable, 20 year max resource. (2) Although the industry has tried, there is no "cookie cutter" physical plant plan to mass produce nuclear power generation plants. ALL nuke plants must be individually engineered (meaning no economy of scale = MORE DOLLARS TO BUILD, including the inevitable cost over-runs) per location. Of the 30 or so plans currently under consideration, none of the future nuke plant blueprints have been approved. They simply do not meet the requirements of the authorizing governmental agencies.
So, if our existing nuke plants will all be shut down in a very few number of years, and new nuke plants, even if authorized to be built starting today, cannot come on line for at least 10 - 30 years, providing that they can get financing (which they can't - that's why some power companies in the USA are increasing their prices for electricity - they need to build a fund), why do we need uranium mining and milling at Cole's Hill or any other place in America? Why is the USA selling off excess uranium? We know why the USA imports uranium! It's to keep the bad guys from getting it. This is why Russia has such a lucrative deal with the USA to provide us with around 20% of our uranium needs. We need to corral their uranium stock piles to keep them from going to unfriendlies (to the United States) that will use the uranium to develop nuke and depleted uranium weapon capabilities. This is our (our government, not necessarily representing the people) nuke power problem with countries like Iran. They claim to want a domestic source of nuke energy, but do they? We (our government) claims to want a domestic nuke energy program, but do we (them, the corporation's paid for politicians)? In light of all of the other, truly sustainable, truly "green" Tree Hugger options for domestic energy - including the idea of pouring the nuke trillions of dollars into decentralizing our power supplies by investing in property by property energy independence through solar, wind, etc., that could then provide excess power into our centralized grid - why would we (the people) put up with the archaic, so yesterday, anti people and environment methods of power production that will give us they same old, same old? Sounds like a recipe for functional obsolescence. The same functional obsolescence that killed our auto industry. Something is NOT right. But, I'm sure that, as Tom promotes, we are too stupid to figure it out. After all, a bunch of ignorant rubes should not have anything to do with running the country. Leave that to the governmental experts!
• Chernobyl & Three Mile Island More "Lack of Understanding" and "Fear of the Unknown"? You bet! The ignorant masses, otherwise known worldwide as the "Opposition", do not understand how Chernobyl & Three Mile Island could have happened in light of governmental and corporate assurance that all was well, that melt downs could not possibly happen! In the case of Three Mile Island, the corporate lackeys (otherwise known as our elected government officials) led us to believe that there couldn't possibly be any danger because Three Mile Island was/is extremely well regulated and controlled. Inspections would/will surely find any potential problem(s) and make sure that it never causes any serious situations. Less serious problems, based on what is allowed to be a problem by regulations, will (and do) happen, but these problems will only effect a small number of people, lands, and water ways. If these people are scared, they can move - nobody is stopping them. Nobody is forcing them to live in the proximity of a major life threatening catastrophe waiting to happen. The people living in the area knew the risks - there was plenty of debate with the stupid opposition - why did they stay? I'm sure (as Walter Coles Jr. said to me in one of VUI's private presentations) that there was a boom in the real estate prices when uranium, I mean, nuke industry people moved in to fill well paying jobs. Why didn't they sell then? Idiots! I guess they just didn't understand! Guess they're not afraid enough of what "they don't know" to do the smart thing and leave. Because information about Three Mile Island, and every other nuke power plant and uranium mining and milling operation all over the world is readily available to anyone that really wants to know the truth. The pro nukers, miners & millers are not responsible for the ignorance of the masses! Their ignorance is proof as to why corporations, through their elected governing officials, should rule.
– Prejudice BRAVO! What a GREAT MARKETING, PUBLIC RELATIONS WORD to label the "Opposition" with! The word "prejudice" brings to mind ignorant people that are racist and more. Think "Neo-Nazis, Rednecks, Hicks, Stupid, Country Bumpkins, Politically Incorrect (OH NO! NOT POLITICALLY INCORRECT!), etc.
The pro nuke, uranium mining and milling people will try to convince you that anyone opposed to them, you know, the prejudice people that do not want nuke power, and by extension uranium mining and milling, and because, for some reason we are opposed to progress, are just, well, prejudice. Wish I would have thought of this for our opposition campaign! But then, I don't have a Million Dollar Plus (provided by foreign corporations) PR and Marketing budget. If I had thought of this label, I would have said that the pro folks are prejudice against truly sustainable, healthy electric power generation. Oh well! They thought of it first. Guess I'll just try to convince folks to be "discerning" when looking at the issues.
– Mysticism I am indeed mystified! I think it's "magic" the way the pro-nuclear, pro-uranium mining and milling folks twist and ignore the facts. I find it fascinating that they always come up with the money to get their way. I must suspend my disbelief when watching the slight of hand that happens when their lobbyists lobby (that's what they do. A lobbyist's job is to get an elected public servant to do a corporations will) OUR elected officials. Perhaps the corporations have hired an untold number of hypnotists? I can see it now... the room is dark, all eyes are on the lobbyist/hypnotist... the smell of money is wafting through the room (you know, for ambiance), and the lobbyist/hypnotist says: " You are all very greedy..., you all love money and power (rumor has it that you can't hypnotize someone to do anything that they are not already inclined to do)... you will all vote for a "study"..., you will all vote for uranium mining and milling in Virginia... When you awake at the count of three, you will not experience any remorse... You will not worry or think about your lack of personal fact finding... despite the fact that you have many personal aides that could do this for you... at tax payer expense..., Tax payers are only there to provide money for your wants and needs ..., You will be relaxed, happy, and rich... 1.., 2..., 3.....
– Political Positioning You are smart people, despite what Tom thinks! Need I say anything more on this topic? If your answer is yes, I still think that you're smart, but a glutton for punishment.
– Over Reaction I know that many people wrestle with this. What is the "proper" amount of reaction? How should it be expressed? When is it "under reaction"? How can we possibly know in this age of "blip" communication, where we might be misunderstood? What is the "proper" means to react? Who will give us the answers to these profound questions? Are the pro-nuke, uranium mining & milling folks causing us to "react"? If not, who is? Why have I never thought about these issues until VUI/Santoy/Virginia Energy Resources, INC. (whatever they call themselves this week) expressed the desire to make Billions of Dollars by mining and milling uranium in Pittsylvania County? Do the pro-uranium mining & milling folks have the answers? Didn't Walter Cole's say that HE would decide if uranium is mined and milled in Pittsylvania County (and the rest of VA by extension) publicly when he was quoted in many newspapers throughout Virginia as saying "if it can't be done safely, it won't be done"? Did I get short changed on information regarding Walter's qualifications to make this decision for the rest of us? Henry Hurt is quoted as saying: "If we can put a man on the moon, surely we can figure out how to safely mine (and mill) uranium (in the Commonwealth)". I know Henry is smart, but isn't this two different things? Isn't Tom's presentation to the NRC to the NA (NAS?) full of opinion and hyperbole, designed to discredit anyone with questions, never mined opposed to, nuke power, uranium mining & milling? Somebody! Please help me to react appropriately to this demeaning, paid for by the nuke industry, presentation! I'm at a loss... of knowledge as to the correct amount of reaction I should have to this insulting presentation, and the lack of indignation from MY elected officials, and... money to present real facts by people that are rightfully opposed to nuke energy, uranium mining and milling (STRONG PRESENTATIONS WITHOUT APOLOGY!).
I don't have a Million Dollar Plus marketing & Public Relations budget. I only have this one little blog and the goodwill (if I become a "story") of the media. Perhaps Tom will help me to react appropriately...
– Media Sensationalism MY EXPERIENCE IS THAT THE "MEDIA" TYPICALLY DOES NOT "SENSATIONALIZE"!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Except for editorial opinion pieces that can make, or break a movement that "they" don't approve of (let the "media" - Danville Register & Bee - figure out what I mean by this). Typically, the "media" reports. That's their job. You will always have young, cub reporters (think John Crane) that, if there is nothing newsworthy that's sensational, will create sensation in how he chooses to report. This "killing of the Golden Goose" is how these young reporters, to their chagrin, think that they can create a "story" worth printing. Anyone that has undergone "how to deal with the media 101" in corporate training knows to watch out for this. Even so, sometimes you get blind-sided by an overzealous, trying-to-be-up-and-comer reporter.
It's up to the "warring factions" to make news, and "sensationalize" a subject. The media coverage of dissenting voices is Tom's topic in this presentation to the NRC of the NA (NAS?). My opinion is that Tom is warning the "media". He's telling them to print only the pro-nuke, pro-uranium mining and milling perspectives or risk the wrath of the "powers that be".
Unless, of course, they are favorably reporting the pro side of things! Some "media" might be happy with that. Unfortunately, the era of true investigative reporting has gone the way of the dinosaur. It's much more cost effective to "stir the pot" than to truly dig in and uncover the facts! If this is not true, let the "media" prove me wrong. Let the "media" not make decisions about content based on advertising dollars. Let the "media" prove that "news" and "investigative journalism" is based on issues independent of ratings, readership, advertising (real or potential) dollars, and political influence. Let the "media" win back the respect that it once had. This is the ONLY way that the "media" can counter the charge of "media sensationalism" leveled by the pro-nuke, pro-uranium mining & milling industry.
– Mistrust of Government Regulators Let's see... where to begin... No matter which side of the aisle you are on, all of us can list a multitude of sins (some listed in this editorial) that cause us, as individuals and groups of people, to not trust "The Government". Why is that? Why is it that the only constituency that does trust "The Government" has names that end in INC. and LLC? Could it be that these "people" know something that we don't?
Look, there are plenty (a majority) of companies and corporations, both for-profit and not-for-profit, that are "good corporate citizens". Indeed, non-profits (such as The Alliance, CELDF, SCC, United Way, Kids & Kritters to name a few) could not exist without the American corporate structure. There would also be many (vastly many) jobs that would not exist without small, for-profit enterprises. But, let's be realistic! None of these not-for-profit and small for-profit corporations can dictate "government regulations" like national & international corporations can.
Surprise! Our elected and appointed government officials DO NOT dictate "government regulations" So, who does dictate "government regulations"?
Big corporations. Not local Mom & Pops. Really HUGE corporations. The kind of corporations that put local (including regional and some state wide) businesses out of business! These conglomerates, often financed from foreign (not American) resources, such as VUI/Santoy/Virginia Energy Resources - a wholly owned CANADIAN corporation - have the financial resources to buy anything they want! Including our government. How do they do this? They have a multi-prong approach (just go to the Canadian stock exchange to see what Walter & company is up to). They promote their cause publicly through the media and charitable donations. In fact, they put millions of dollars (don't believe for one minute the "small company" poverty plea of VUI, "America") into "Public Education, Public Relations, Advertising, and Marketing campaigns".
They hire the best, high powered lobbyists that they can afford (trust me, they have the best). These lobbyists write the proposed legislation. Remember, it was Whitt Clement, Brother-In-Law to Walter Coles, (the man that has taken it upon himself to decide if uranium mining & milling is "safe" on his property - he owns the biggest share of the ore that, when mined & milled, will pay him, at minimum, Millions. The ore is estimated to be worth Billions as long as there is a domestic world wide nuke energy market for it. No wonder VUI's private presentations focus on the nuclear industry instead of the local issue of uranium mining & milling. In fact, you really can't get them - VUI - to talk much about the local issue of uranium mining and milling) and a renowned Richmond lobbyist that convinced VA Senator Frank Wagner to include uranium mining and milling in his 2006 energy bill, later adopted by the Governor of Virginia. We (the people) have been under the threat of this scourge on humanity ever since. We, the people, NEVER asked for this controversy. Walter Coles and his investors forced this controversy on us, against our will. They have manipulated the General Assembly, the Coal & Energy Commission (not an elected panel, but an appointed panel responsible to, and reporting to no one. So, what's in this for them?), and the media to achieve their goals. The nuke industry, in full support of uranium mining and milling, manipulates through presentations like Tom's to the national government, and appointed governmental bodies such as the NRC of the NA (NAS?), and the media. The nuke industry also forces it's propaganda on unwitting citizens through paid advertising and the intimidation... I mean manipulation... of the "media".
Have I mentioned that industries such as nuke energy and mining of every kind - including uranium mining and milling - are the ones that write the regulations? Sad, but true. Our government (the elected people that supposedly represent you and me) consider the industry people the experts in the field. Therefore, our elected officials abdicate their responsibilities to protect us poor dumb citizens to the very people that are in the business to make money. This is where the idea of "cost benefit analysis" comes from. Big corporations analyze their potential financial exposure concerning breaking their own "regulations". The regulations that they had their elected officials put in place. If their analysis determines that it is more profitable to "break the regulations", also known as committing an illegal act, they will do so. After all, they know the rules (that they made) and repercussions much better than anyone else. It's their business to know!
This finally brings us to the idea that people have a "mistrust" of government regulators. Duh! Why should we trust government regulators when they work for the very corporations that they are supposed to regulate. At best, they will find wrong doing and impose the sanctions that the regulated industry has approved, creating a profitable (but not healthy) situation for all (of them) concerned. Even if a regulatory agency wanted to do its job for the people, they DO NOT have the money. Want proof? Take a look at how many inspectors there are, per state, and how many bridges per state they are required to "regulate", inspect, keep safe for the citizens. It makes me cringe every time I cross one. It's not the inspector's fault, it's the government's fault. It's not the government's fault, it's the people's fault. In this case, the "people" does not include corporations.
Corporations are only "people" when it comes to "their" (whoever "they" are) rights. Funny how corporation rights always trump people's rights. Its like corporations have the same number of votes that every counted-in-the-census human being has, times two! Now we're back to mysticism. I think this has something to do with the smell of money in the room whenever big corporations influence... I mean talk to their... I mean our, elected government officials.
Trust the regulators? I think not! We, THE PEOPLE, have plenty of reason to not trust them.
So, the call to action? I challenge every person (not corporations, but including their elected officials) to do the following:
- Ask yourself what YOU are doing to learn the facts?
- Ask yourself what YOU are doing to make a difference in the debate?
- Ask yourself how much respect you have for someone that deliberately remains ignorant of the issues in today's world of information technology, yet espouses their opinion as if it's fact?
- Ask yourself how much respect you have for an industry (the entire nuke industry from uranium mining and milling to power plants and depleted uranium ordinance production) that spends Millions of Dollars to control your government, your media, and the very thoughts that you think? An industry that would allow, indeed sponsor, Tom Pool, Chairman, International Nuclear, to speak on its behalf? An industry that demeans and ridicules, demonizes and criminalizes, any PERSON that disagrees with them. Ask yourself, are they looking out for your best interest, or theirs?
- Ask yourself how you really feel about the corporate owned politicians that sanction this abuse of you and your family? Ask yourself if you want a country ruled by BULLIES?
- Ask yourself what are YOU doing to educate the, according to Tom Pool, Chairman, International Nuclear, ignorant masses (my words, his by inference)?
- Ask yourself, are YOU willing to do anything at all, one way or the other? If not, don't think that you have any right to rejoice or complain no matter what happens. You deserve to get what your sowing reaps. If so, and I'm referring to REAL human beings, NOT corporations, THEN DO IT. Thinking about it doesn’t count. DO SOMETHING! Doing something DOES NOT include living in the past, using this crisis to remind all concerned of past glories. When you do this, you make yourself look foolish and irrelevant. It causes people that may be on your side to distance themselves from you. It hurts your cause. It doesn’t matter what you've done in the past, or how long your family has lived in the South. What matters is your RELEVANT contribution to the issues at hand. Doing something DOES NOT mean seeking media attention and glory for yourself. This is not productive to your cause. The issues are important, not the people that deliver the message.
- If you do something, understand that YOU are doing it. Take pride in that! Do not rely on groups (such as The Alliance or SCC), or any one individual, to take action for you. Take personal responsibility for the outcome of this and any other issue that you feel is important.
- Participate in YOUR government. The surest way to take back our inherent, and rightful, governing authority is to participate in the process. Attend your Town & City council meetings. Attend your County Board of Supervisors meetings. Attend your School Board meetings. Attend your Zoning Commission meetings. LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD! There is a saying that "all politics is local". If you do not regain control of the polotics at the local level, you will never stand a chance of demanding your constitutional rights at the state and federal level. The pro-nuke, pro-uranium mining and milling corporations may have a LOT of dollars to vote with, but THE PEOPLE still go to the ballot box. Ultimately it is We, The People, that allow these travesties, these corruptions of our way of life to happen. It is up to each of us to take a stand, to participate, to own our futures. To say loud and clear, I claim MY right to live free of the corruption that has become prevalent in MY country, the United States of America.
- Recognize that our government has become corrupted by mega national and international corporations. Recognize that YOU have a right to live in this country free of the abuse and corruption in YOUR government that is being caused by these corporations.
Are YOU listening? Are you THINKING?
Will you heed this call to action?
Uranium Mining Whistleblower
Uraniumhead
Down The Yellowcake Road
Please visit Down The Yellowcake Road. Your donation will help produce more of these quality documentaries.
World Report: Uranium Mining: Vital for the Future, But Not in My Backyard!
Cover to Cover
Shireen Parsons is featured in this TV interview.
LEAVE IT IN THE GROUND!
Historic Leases That VUI Wants
Marline held 40,000 acres in Pittsylvania County alone! Coles Hill will only be the FIRST mine! YOU'RE NEXT!
CHECK OUT OUR CALENDAR OF EVENTS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE!
While looking at the calendar, take a moment to join THE Alliance!
Join the Fight!
1. To become a member of THE Alliance, fill in the Membership Form at the bottom of this page (SCROLL DOWN).
2. Be sure to Subscribe to this Blog (scroll down). This will ALWAYS be free.
3. Educate yourself with the information posted here
4. Participate in THE Alliance activities
5. Once you have joined THE Alliance and paid your membership fee, you will receive an invitation to join our exclusive List Serve. Be sure to accept this invitation! This will be the only way that members will receive exclusive information from THE Alliance. You will also be able to voice your opinions.
2. Be sure to Subscribe to this Blog (scroll down). This will ALWAYS be free.
3. Educate yourself with the information posted here
4. Participate in THE Alliance activities
5. Once you have joined THE Alliance and paid your membership fee, you will receive an invitation to join our exclusive List Serve. Be sure to accept this invitation! This will be the only way that members will receive exclusive information from THE Alliance. You will also be able to voice your opinions.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR BLOG HERE! Keep up with the latest info delivered directly to your email!
Hurricane Fran, Flood Of '96
Raw home video of the flood in the Coles Hill area. TO WATCH THIS VIDEO FULL SCREEN, PRESS PLAY, THEN LEFT DOUBLE CLICK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SCREEN. THIS WILL TAKE YOU TO You Tube WHERE YOU CAN WATCH IT FULL SCREEN. IT'S MUCH EASIER TO READ THE TRANSITION SCREENS THIS WAY.
LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT!
February 18, 2009, John Crane, of the Danville Register and Bee, quoted the Chairman of the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors, Coy Harville (known by some as "King Coy") as saying: "Davis’ authorship of a resolution without telling the board ahead of time was "sneaky." However, Harville said he voted for it because the resolution, when given to the Coal and Energy Commission’s Uranium Subcommittee, won’t make much difference anyway."
"It’s just a piece of paper," he said.
Harville, who had initially voted for the combined resolution before supporting Davis’, declined to reveal his opinion of uranium mining, saying instead there’s a state moratorium on the practice.
This is in response to Supervisor Hank Davis' motion to resolve that the "Study Commission", currently considering a study to lift the moratorium on uranium mining and milling in Virginia, must find that there be "no damage or harm to Pittsylvania County, its businesses, institutions, environments, and its citizens by uranium mining, as opposed to a cost/benefit approach to this issue or simply accepting minimal damages". Supervisor Marshall Ecker seconded this motion.
In other words, the "Study Commission" must find that this criterion is met conclusively and absolutely before recommending that the current moratorium on uranium mining be lifted.
The above language is EXACTLY what Mr. Davis submitted to the County for the BOS Packet for the 2/17/09 BOS meeting. It appears that, at least Mr. Sleeper (County Administrator), felt a need to rewrite Mr. Davis' resolution to be submitted to the full Board. TALK ABOUT SNEAKY!
Could it be that Mr. Sleeper was directed to do this by a higher authority? The County Administrator is subject to the Chairman of the Board's direction when the BOS is not in session...
Mr. Davis did not accept this weak, groveling, resolution and submitted his original material.
After a nonsensical debate of "combining" the two resolutions, Mr. Davis' resolution was passed unanimously.
As a member of the audience watching this comedy of errors, I must tell you that, in my mind, this unanimous vote nearly didn't happen. My impression, watching Mr. Harville, was that he found himself surprised that EVERY hand was up in favor of Mr. Davis' resolution. It appeared to me that, this being the case, as opposed to the usual "gang of 4" block vote - Harville, Pritchett, Snead and Barber, that he is used to, he found himself the odd man out, so stuck his hand up and declared a "unanimous" vote.
Harville's inane comments recorded above proves out my impression and shows, in my mind, his complete and utter disdain of Pittsylvania County, its businesses, institutions, environments, and its citizens.
It is obvious that his vote was meaningless to him! One must wonder why? It is SHOCKING that an elected "servant" of the community would react this way!
So, other than producing a "wasted" piece of paper (by the way, as much as I hate to admit it, Harville's statements are TRUE), what was accomplished Tuesday night?
Tuesday night proved that people, working together for a common cause, CAN have control of their future and take back their inherent GOVERNING AUTHORITY! King Coy and his ilk DO NOT RULE US! They REPRESENT US! They do not, and will not, work for CORPORATION'S INTERESTS ON OUR DIME!
Davis and Ecker deserve our thanks and support. They have helped us to achieve a major, if inadequate step.
The next step will be to codify into law protections that will forever protect "Pittsylvania County, its businesses, institutions, environments, and its citizens".
GV
JOBS?
I challenge VUI/Santoy to qualify and QUANTIFY their claim of 300 - 500 jobs! Until they do, their words are NOTHING but wishful thinking! Designed to mis-lead the people to gain their support! GV
Uranium Mines & Mills Throughout The World
What would happen if there was massive flooding (such as Hurricane Fran) and Coles Hill had 2 open pits, each as big as what you will see in these photos?
URANIUM - THE MOVIE
Please Watch The Award Winning Movie, URANIUM, After Our Membership Application at the Bottom of This Page.
This movie tells you everything you need to know about uranium mining & milling. PLEASE WATCH.
I know it's about 45 minutes long, but it is well worth your time!
Gregg
This movie tells you everything you need to know about uranium mining & milling. PLEASE WATCH.
I know it's about 45 minutes long, but it is well worth your time!
Gregg
There Is No Energy Crisis, There is a Crisis of Ignorance
Salt Water Fuel
HARNESSING THE POWER OF WAVES & TIDES
Alternative Energy: Wave-Powered Ocean Energy Technology
What's Behind Uranium Mining And Milling In Virginia
To watch this movie full screen, click in the center of the player. This will take you to the movie at YouTube. Click the lower right corner of the player at YouTube. This will give you a full screen view.
VUI and the General Assembly
To watch this movie full screen, click in the center of the player. This will take you to the movie at YouTube. Click the lower right corner of the player at YouTube. This will give you a full screen view.
Part 3 Candian Company?
To watch this movie full screen, click in the center of the player. This will take you to the movie at YouTube. Click the lower right corner of the player at YouTube. This will give you a full screen view.
Part 4 - VUI's Advertised Goals
To watch this movie full screen, click in the center of the player. This will take you to the movie at YouTube. Click the lower right corner of the player at YouTube. This will give you a full screen view.
Part 5 - Vui's True Goals per Their Prospectus
To watch this movie full screen, click in the center of the player. This will take you to the movie at YouTube. Click the lower right corner of the player at YouTube. This will give you a full screen view.
Part 6 A - VUI's Risks
To watch this movie full screen, click in the center of the player. This will take you to the movie at YouTube. Click the lower right corner of the player at YouTube. This will give you a full screen view.
Part 6 B
To watch this movie full screen, click in the center of the player. This will take you to the movie at YouTube. Click the lower right corner of the player at YouTube. This will give you a full screen view.
PIT MINING BLASTS
This is how open pit mining is done. This dust will go into our air and settle on our land AND in our water. This is the first step in a chain of events that will pollute our environment. We will breathe, eat, and drink this poison. It will cause cancer and a host of other health problems slowly, over time. The build up of radioactive elements, lead, arsenic, and other heavy metals is accumulative. THIS DUST KILLS! MINING AND MILLING OF URANIUM MUST NEVER HAPPEN IN VIRGINIA!
CLICK THE MENU BUTTON ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT OF THE MOVIE PLAYER SCREEN TO VIEW A VARIETY OF CLIPS
Part 8 A - Our Concerns
To watch this movie full screen, click in the center of the player. This will take you to the movie at YouTube. Click the lower right corner of the player at YouTube. This will give you a full screen view.
All That Glitters is not Gold
Why is SCC and the Alliance concerned about uranium mining and milling in Virginia? This short film really sums it up! It's about the Olympic Dam uranium mine in South Australia. Their plight mirrors our own if uranium mining and milling EVER takes place in Virginia.
URANIUM MINING & MILLING HAS NEVER BEEN DONE SAFELY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD!
WHILE SOME SAY THAT THEY WANT (AND NEED) A "STUDY", THE ONLY TRUE INFORMATION CAN COME FROM WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN THE PAST.
Studying "how" to mine and mill uranium in Virginia is much different than studying "should" we mine and mill uranium in Virginia. REMEMBER: All uranium mining and milling has been done with the "latest technology" since its inception.
ALL OF THAT TECHNOLOGY HAS FAILED!
Since mining and milling has NEVER been done in an area with our population (OVER 500,000 people within 120 miles of the proposed mine and milling operation and many, many more down stream to the Atlantic Ocean) and our net precipitation (greater than evaporation) any "study" of "how" to mine and mill uranium in Pittsylvania County, or anywhere else in Virginia, will be a THEORY. AN EXPERIMENT! Remember your school days? In science class you posed a theory, then designed an experiment to prove it true or false. THIS EXPERIMENT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO KILL!
How Radiation Gets Into Your System
This is a chart showing you how uranium mining & milling dust and leaching enters our environment causing you to breathe and ingest it.
RADON QUESTIONS? ASK RADON DALE!
Call Radon Free or click to visit their web site
Links to Other US Community Fights vs Uranium Mining
- 220 South
- CCNR
- CELDF
- Chatham Views
- Coloradans Against Resource Destruction (C.A.R.D.)
- Defenders of the Black Hills (South Dakota)
- Mining Law Reform
- Nuclear Free NB
- Piedmont Environmental Council
- Powertech Exposed
- SCC Against Uranium
- Sierra Club Virginia Chapter
- Southern Environmental Law Center
- The Goliad Project (Texas)
- The Virginia Coservation Network
- Uranium on the Cranium
- Wise Uranium
WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN A DICUSSION ABOUT URANIUM MINING? JOIN THE NoVaUranium LISTSERVE HERE!
Wise Uranium Slide Show
Click here to watch a 45 minute slide show that details uranium mining, tailings management, and dangers of mining and milling uranium. As you watch this slide show, keep in mind that the deposit at Coles Hill is estimated to contain 110 MILLION pounds of uranium ore. This means that approximately 74 MILLION POUNDS (30,579 TONS) of waste rock will be produced. This waste rock (Tailings) will have to be contained/disposed of for at least 1,000 years!
Wise Uranium Slide Show
What is......THE Alliance!!!
THE Alliance is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit corporation dedicated to fighting corporate assaults through Rights Based Organizing and Education. Our goal is to help preserve the quality of life in the communities that we work with. Our current focus is on the impending mining & milling of uranium in Virginia.
In 1983, as now, the desire of local and multi-national corporations to mine uranium in Pittsylvania County, and eventually the entire state, is of immediate and urgent concern.
We oppose this and any exploratory drilling because we know that it cannot be done safely! We also oppose it because of the burden of the environmental clean up that will be placed on our local communities, state, and future generations when the mine companies cease their operations.
We oppose it because of the extremely negative economic and social impact it will have on our fragile local economies. And, we oppose it because of the disastrous effect it will have on the esthetics of our beautiful, bountiful lands.
In 1983, as now, the desire of local and multi-national corporations to mine uranium in Pittsylvania County, and eventually the entire state, is of immediate and urgent concern.
We oppose this and any exploratory drilling because we know that it cannot be done safely! We also oppose it because of the burden of the environmental clean up that will be placed on our local communities, state, and future generations when the mine companies cease their operations.
We oppose it because of the extremely negative economic and social impact it will have on our fragile local economies. And, we oppose it because of the disastrous effect it will have on the esthetics of our beautiful, bountiful lands.
GET YOUR "NO URANIUM" WINDOW SIGN HERE
Sign Our On-line Petition! (click link below)
Example: Open Pit Uranium Mine, Ranger, Australia
Coming Soon to Chatham, VA?
Yard Signs Signs Now Available!
To get your Anti-Uranium Mining Yard Signs, send an email with your contact information to: alliance123@ymail.com.
$10 each.
$10 each.
URANIUM---The Movie !!
If you care about Pittsylvania County......
If you care about who gets to make the decisions that affect you and your family........
If you care about what all the "buzz" is about........
If you care..................
scroll to the bottom of this page and take the time to watch the excellent documentary, Uranium. It lasts about 1 hour.
This movie is presented for educational purposes only. Do not exhibit this movie commercially without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder. To order this movie, please click here.
If you care about who gets to make the decisions that affect you and your family........
If you care about what all the "buzz" is about........
If you care..................
scroll to the bottom of this page and take the time to watch the excellent documentary, Uranium. It lasts about 1 hour.
This movie is presented for educational purposes only. Do not exhibit this movie commercially without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder. To order this movie, please click here.
Contact Your Elected/Appointed Officials
- Pittsylvania County Bd of Supervsrs-2008 Emails
- Chatham Town Council-2008 Phones
- Pittsylvania Bd of Zoning Appls-2008 Phones
- Pittsylvania Planning Comm-2008 Phones
- Danville City Council-2008 Emails
- Halifax County Bd of Supevsrs-2008 Emails
- Halifax Town Council-2008 Emails
- Halifax State Legislators-2008 Emails
- Martinsville City council-2008 Emails
- Henry County Bd of Supvsrs-2008 Emails
- Senators-2008 Phones
- House of Delegates-2008 Phones
- Senate Rules Comm-2008 Emails
- Senate Agriculture Comm-2008 Emails
- House Rules Comm-2008 Emails
- Senators-2008 Phones
Send Your letter to the Editor Statewide
Have your thoughts, feelings, and opinions heard Statewide!! Clink on the link below to access newspapers across the state! Follow instructions to send your letter to as many as 17 different newspapers!
http://www.mediafire.com/?uovnmyp2srt
Find Posts by Category
- ?
- .04 tons volatile organic compounds
- .043 tons sulphur dioxide
- .11 tons carbon monoxide
- .5 tons nitrogen oxides
- $50 billion
- 1872 Mining Law
- abandoned mines
- accident
- Action
- Africa
- Against People Will
- Agreement State
- agricultural
- agricultural production
- Air Pollutants
- air-quality effects
- Alliance
- alternative energy
- American Municipal Power
- animals
- Anit-Uranium
- anti-Nuke Plants
- anti-uranium
- Areva
- arms dealers
- arsenic
- ash pond
- asthma
- Attor General
- Australia
- Autism
- AZ
- Babcock and Wilcox
- Ban Mt Top Removal
- BAN URANIUM MINING
- banking
- banned
- Bannister River
- beryllium disease
- bias
- bias NAS
- bias uranium study
- Biofuel
- Birth Defects
- blasting
- Board of Supervisors
- book
- BoomToBurst
- Boucher
- breaking news
- breast cancer
- Bureau of Land Management
- burst
- Bush Era Environ.
- Cameco
- Canada
- Canadian mining companies
- Cancer
- Cap And Trade
- card
- Caswell County
- CBS
- chatham
- Chatham Town Council
- Chernobyl Children Life Line
- Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant
- children
- Children’s IQ
- Church Rock uranium tailings spill
- claims
- Clean Air Act
- clean coal
- clean tech
- Clean Water Act
- cleanup
- cleanup of uranium mines
- climate change
- co2
- CO2-e
- Coal
- coal ash
- coal hearing
- coal mining
- Coles
- Coles Hill
- Colorado
- Colville band
- community Bill of Rights
- comprehensive plan
- Concern Scientist
- conference
- Congressman Tom Perriello
- conservation
- conservation groups
- constitution
- contamination
- Core Samples
- Corp Greed
- corp rights
- CORP VA
- cost
- County Gov't
- court
- cover up
- Cows
- Criminal
- customers prepaid for nuke plants
- Damange
- danville
- deadly deceit
- Death
- Deaths
- Decommissioning
- DEMOCRACY
- democratic gov't
- Demonstration
- Denison Mines
- depleted uranium
- dept of interior
- Design Flaws
- Difference
- Dillion Rule
- dirty money to NAS
- documentary
- DOE
- Downwinder Program
- Dr Helen Caldicott
- Dr. Brugge
- Drill Holes
- drilling
- drinking water
- dust
- e
- EarthHour
- Earthjustice
- earthquakes
- Eco Images
- Eco News
- Eco Opportunity
- Eco Tech
- economic and environmental damage
- editorial
- Education
- Educational Seminar
- Electric Cars
- Electric Credit
- energy
- energy revolution
- energy study
- Energy Watch
- England
- Environment
- environmental disaster
- environmental groups
- Environmental Law
- Environmental laws
- Environmentalists
- EPA
- Europe
- evacuated
- excess government uranium
- Extreme Cost
- farms
- fed'l compensation program
- Fed'l law
- Federal Gov't
- financial responsibility
- Finland
- fire
- First Nations
- fish kill
- floating nuclear plants
- Flooded Uranium Mine
- Flooding
- Fly Rock
- foreign corporation
- Forest Fire
- fowls killed
- FRAC Act
- fracking
- france
- free speech
- Fun
- gas drilling
- General Assembly
- genetic defects
- Germany
- Global Assault
- Global Warmining
- gov of VA
- gov't corruption
- governor
- Grand Canyon
- Grants
- GREEDY
- Green Energy
- Green Jobs
- Green Power
- green roof
- greenpeac
- Greenpeace
- h
- hardrock mining
- hardrock mining industry
- hate crimes
- hazard potential
- hazardous
- he
- health
- health problems
- Health risks moved to #1
- health study
- hearing
- heart problems
- History
- history of Hard Rock mining
- history of uranium mining
- hold
- Honest Science
- Hopi Tribe
- Houses
- huge water usage
- Human Cost
- Hurricanes
- Hydraulic Fracturing
- Hydro Power
- hypocrite
- illegal dumping
- Illegal Study
- illegal uranium sales
- In-situ Leaching
- Inc.
- India
- Indigenous Issues
- industrial mega-park
- Inexperienced Nuke workers
- Instable Economy
- insurance
- Internet
- invest
- Iodine Pills
- IRAQ POSTWAR ILLNESSES
- isl
- isr milling
- ium
- Japan
- job layoffs
- Jobs
- Kansas
- Kilgore
- Kyrgyzstan
- Lakes
- landslide
- largest open pit mine
- law
- Law Suit
- Lead poisoning
- leaking pipes
- legal actions
- legal mining
- letter
- Letter.
- Leukaemia
- Licenses
- Lies
- limit exposure
- lining
- listening tour
- Lobbyist
- Local Gov't
- Los Angeles
- lost of life
- Louisiana
- Low power usage
- Lower Taxes
- lynchburg
- Malawi
- Maryland
- McCain
- meeting
- Memorial Day
- Mercury
- merger
- metals
- mine
- Mine Tailings
- Mineral Rights
- miners laidoff
- mini-nuke-plants
- mining
- mining accident
- mining companies pay for environmental cleanup
- mining deaths
- Mining Mistakes
- mining practices
- mining study
- mining study subcommitttee
- Mistake
- modern uranium mining
- moratorium
- Mother Earth
- mountaintop removal process
- MountainTopRemoval
- mox
- Mt. Taylor
- MtTopRemoval
- National Academies of Science
- National Academy of Sciences
- Native American
- native americans
- Natural Gas
- Natural Problems
- Navajo Nation
- NC
- neurotoxic effects
- New Group
- New Mexico
- New Mining Act
- Newco
- News
- Newuranium
- NIOSH Reports
- no Coal Plants
- No Economic Gains
- no fishing
- NO MT TOP REMOVAL
- No Nuke Plants
- No Plan
- NO TO NUKE POWER
- No Uranium Mining
- No Uranium Mining and Milling
- No"Nuclear Renaissance"
- nobel price
- NoSubsidies
- not my fault
- nrc
- nuclear
- nuclear accident
- nuclear bomb
- nuclear cycle
- nuclear energy
- Nuclear espionage
- nuclear fuel
- nuclear issues
- nuclear meltdown
- nuclear plant accidents
- nuclear power
- nuclear power breakdown
- Nuclear Power Mistake
- Nuclear Power Plants
- Nuclear Power Problems
- Nuclear Power Waste
- nuclear reprocessing failure
- nuclear tests
- nuclear waste
- nuclear weapons
- nuke chain
- nuke plant problems
- Nuke Plants Accidents
- nuke truck
- nuke waste problem
- nukepills
- Nukes
- obama
- ocean
- off grid
- Oklahoma
- Open Pit Mines
- Opinion
- OrdinanceBanUraniumMining
- Organizing for America
- paid by Taxpayers
- Pavillion
- pay-to-play
- people died
- peoples rights
- petition
- Pittsylvania County
- Pittsylvania County Planning Commission
- Play
- Politics
- Pollutant
- pollutants
- pollution
- poor quality mat
- Preserve Lands
- Process Out of State Radiation Waste
- Protected Area
- protects
- protests
- ProUraniumGroup
- radiation
- Radiation Exposure Compensation Act
- Radiation Exposure-Children
- radioactive waste
- radioactivity
- radon
- randon
- reactor goes critical
- recession
- reclaim
- reclamation
- Renewable Energy
- Rep. Tom Perriello
- resolution
- Revising its Health and Environmental Standards
- Rivers
- Roanoke River Basin
- Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission
- Russia
- Santoy
- Santoy Resources Ltd
- school replacement
- Science
- SD
- Secretary Chu
- SELC
- shareholders
- shutdown
- sick
- sludge ponds
- smuggling uranium
- so call energy bill
- soil contamination
- Solar Energy
- South Carolina
- South Korea
- southside
- Soviets
- spent nuke fuel
- spies
- state environ. agency
- state law
- state laws
- State of VA
- Staunton River supervisor
- stimulus
- stock
- stocks
- storms
- study
- Subsidies Paid by Taxpayers
- sue
- Summer Storm
- super fund
- Supreme Court
- Sustainable Energy
- swine flu
- tailings facilities
- Tea Party
- Texas
- THE Allliance
- Tom in Your Town
- tornado
- Tourism
- tourist
- town closing
- toxic chemical
- toxic legacy
- toxics
- toxins
- Training Workshops
- tritium
- Troops
- Trouble Nuke Plant
- Trucks
- true green power
- TVA
- Two Mile
- uanium mining
- Underreported Struggles
- Unstable Price for Uranium
- UP Mich
- uranium
- Uranium Ban
- uranium case
- Uranium Drill Holes
- uranium enrichment plant
- uranium exploration licenses
- uranium forum
- Uranium hexafluoride
- uranium in Virginia
- Uranium Job Bust
- uranium leases
- uranium mill tailings
- Uranium Milling
- Uranium Mine Purchases
- Uranium Mining
- uranium mining and milling
- Uranium Mining Closes
- Uranium Mining Death
- uranium mining past problems
- Uranium Mining Water Problems
- uranium open pit mine
- uranium plant
- Uranium Pollution
- uranium prices
- uranium prices down
- Uranium Resolution
- uranium shortage
- Uranium Study
- uranium tailings
- uranium truck wreck
- uranium waste
- uranium workers
- uranium-leaching heap
- USGS
- Utah
- va
- VCN
- VERI
- Violates Resolution
- violation
- Virginia
- Virginia Coal co.
- Virginia Energy Resources Inc
- Virginia energy tax holiday
- Virginia Uranium
- Virginia's Hurricane
- VRRBAC meeting
- VUI
- warm water discharge
- warner
- Washington State
- waste disposal sites
- water
- water contamination
- Water problems
- water rights
- Water Shortage
- Watkins Abbitt
- wells
- West VA
- WHO
- WildLife Impact
- Wimpy Fed't Govt
- wind
- Wind Energy
- wind storm
- WindMills
- Workers Layoff
- working conditions
- yellow cake
Links to Documents
- Halifax Town Council Resolution 12-10-07
- Map of Coles Hill area
- Orange County Resltn 12-18-07
- Our IRS 501 (c) (3) Status letter
- Petition
- Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Advisory Comm
- SCC ltr to Pitt BOS re Waste Ord 12-31-07
- VA House of Delegates-Phones
- VA State Senators-Phones
- VUI Special Use Permit Appl 11-28-07
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1098)
-
▼
May
(120)
- More on mining
- It's Gone, Baby, Gone for More Appalachian Mountains
- Statement of Task
- The Time is Now for Planning Decision
- German City Emerges as a World Class Energy-Saver
- Navajos join waste cleanup lawsuit
- In Finland, Nuclear Renaissance Runs Into Trouble
- Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant Malfunction
- Staunton River supervisor to hold meeting on land ...
- Alarm bells ring for foreign uranium miners in Kaz...
- Tennessee's sick nuclear workers get $1 billion
- Jaduguda residents object to renewal of uranium mi...
- Urgent questions remain regarding the two uranium ...
- Uranium Study Set
- Ritter to receive letters of concern about mining ...
- Santoy Announces Virginia Uranium Plan of Arrangem...
- 15 people arrested for protesting Virginia Congres...
- Effects of uranium mines – photo exhibition at the...
- NUCLEAR POWER: No More Reactors at North Anna
- Chernobyl victims enjoy holiday
- Renewable energy at home
- The True Meaning of Memorial Day!
- W.A.R.N. Health Investigation 1980 - Summary
- No Uranium Mining Letters
- 17 arrested for protesting Massey mine blast plan
- Uranium safety priority leaves doubts
- Global Warming Bill Passes
- MOX fuel arrives amid strong protest
- Australian nuclear waste reaches US
- Comment: Remember the NRC is a federal part of go...
- Uranium study Ok’d; Public-safety, health-impact i...
- Uranium mines 'flood prone'
- In-situ mining remediation not as reliable as you ...
- Virginia panel OKs uranium mining study
- Virginia panel OKs uranium mining study
- Keeping Agriculture Alive in the Shadow of a Urani...
- Letter to Greenpeace about VUI's WebPage
- U.K. Expert: U.S. is Not Losing International 'Rac...
- Uranium tunnel plans undermines Kakadu
- State Officials to West Virginians: “Mercury is A-...
- US lawmakers reject nuclear in renewable power goal
- Mill termed “perpetual radioactive hazardous waste...
- Child Leukemia Rates Increase Near U.S. Nuclear Po...
- State faces loss of mine cleanup money
- South Carolina Says “NO” To Mountaintop Removal Coal.
- Uranium Mining Pollutes Drinking Water
- CHAT WITH A FIRE TOWER
- Areva plant expansion on hold
- 7 reasons why nuclear power is stupid
- Ralph Nader Rips Obama For Not Phasing Out Nuclear...
- Nuclear energy deal not welcomed by all
- New uranium mining near Grand Canyon
- Uranium Mining on the Blue Ridge
- BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE
- Uranium investment: knowing the value but not the ...
- NO to Uranium Power - Antinuclear Climate
- UPDATE 2-Entergy shuts NY Indian Point 3 reactor
- Uranium topic of the day Thursday
- Uranium Mine Battle Set in Goliad
- Public to weigh in on uranium mill permit
- Cancer, genetic defects
- Environmental Influences on the Health of Children
- Uranium gouging in Goliad
- Uranium Mining Controversy Continues
- Forum and Santoy Form Joint Venture on Karpinka Pr...
- A Song of Hope & Resistance from Michigan
- Uranium mining claims crop up near proposed Dolore...
- Britain's farmers still restricted by Chernobyl nu...
- Uranium hopefuls trim plans
- Santoy Resources agrees to acquire stake in Virgin...
- Navajos Await Decision On Churchrock Cleanup - Wor...
- Niger’s uranium, poverty and France’s growing wealth
- Oklahoma needs millions to fix mines
- Safety threat to planned nuclear power stations
- Win-Wind: Nuclear Power Setback Could Be Windpower...
- Santoy/VIRGINIA URANIUM LTD.
- India: Breathing, Eating and Drinking Radiation in...
- Firm plans to drill for uranium near Datil
- Russian Company Purchases WV Mining Company
- Storm forces Comanche Peak nuclear power plant to ...
- Sign Petition : STOP MINES FROM USING CANADA’S PRI...
- Water safety & quality of life dominate Lake Gasto...
- Teck Cominco fined $1 million by U.S. court
- Obama budget rescinds energy industry tax breaks
- Nuke plant was not required to inspect all pipes
- Changes sought in 1872 mining law as uranium claim...
- One useful thing
- Coal and Energy Commission
- Uranium subcommittee releases proposed final study...
- Abandoned uranium mines pose health risk to New Me...
- Wellinghoff reiterates that more nuclear energy is...
- Get the facts: Uranium mining in Virginia
- Greenpeace and the European Renewable Energy Counc...
- Photovoltaic systems growing faster than other ren...
- Uranium Development Consortium Formed
- US site for producing MOX slammed for poor design
- Public meetings set for May on uranium enrichment ...
- Bureau of Land Management Defies Congressional Ura...
- PHOTOS OF SHORELINE DAMAGE AT THE ROBERTSVILLE SITE
- Anti-mining group meets Meghalaya governor
-
▼
May
(120)
Jeffrey City, Wyoming
An Uranium Ghost Town
MARK YOUR CALENDAR!
Join THE Alliance Here:
After you have submitted your form, we will send you an email confirming your request and giving you an address to send your $25 Membership Fee. REMEMBER! Sign up now through May 25, 2009 and become a Founding Member of THE Alliance. You will never have to pay a membership fee again! After May 25th, an annual membership fee will apply. Please print and save your confimation notice.
THANK YOU FOR JOINING!
form mail
Uranium
Uranium explores the consequences of uranium mining in Canada. Because of toxic and radioactive waste, there are profound, long-term environmental hazards associated with uranium mining. For miners who work at the sites, there is the substantially increased risk of getting cancer. And, because most of the mining to date has been on land historically used by Canada's Native populations, uranium mining violates the traditional economic and spiritual lives of many aboriginal people. Given our limited knowledge of the risks associated with uranium mining, this film questions the validity of its continuation.
Director: Magnus Isacsson
Producer: Dale Phillips
Writing: Michael Riordon
Photography: Barry Perles
Sound: Rick Gustavsen
Sound: Clancy Livingston
Sound: Jeremy Sagar
Sound: Yvon Benoît
Editing: Dominique Fortin
Sound: André Chaput
Voice and Narration: Buffy Ste-Marie
Music: Michael Becker
© National Film Board of Canada. Reproduced with permission of the NFB from www.nfb.ca
No comments:
Post a Comment